NAVICROSS NC35131Recalls & reported problems
Terumo Corporation · NAVICROSS Support Catheter · Class 2
All models of NAVICROSS (11)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04987350709202), received between Feb 14, 2017 and Mar 2, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break4
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Migration2
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient8
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 2, 2026Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: DURING A PERI-VALVULAR LEAK CASE, THE NAVICROSS WAS PUSHED THROUGH THE LEAK, BEHIND THE VALVE AND INTO THE LEFT VENTRICLE. THE WIRE WAS EXCHANGED FOR A SAFARI WIRE. THE NAVICROSS WAS PULLED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE BODY. THERE WAS SOME DIFFICULTY PULLING THE NAVICROSS OUT. AFTER REMOVAL IT WAS NOTICED THAT A MARKER BAND WAS LEFT ON THE WIRE. ATTEMPTS TO SNARE IT OUT WERE MADE. EVENTUALLY THE MARKER BAND ENDED UP IN THE VENTRICLE BEHIND SOME PAPILLARY MUSCLE. THE PATIENT WILL BE BROUGHT BACK IN A FEW WEEKS TO ATTEMPT CLOSURE OF PERIVAVULAR LEAK AGAIN. THE ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS WAS LESS THAN 250CC. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 04FEB2026: SL: THE PATIENT WAS STABLE, AND THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24492481 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2026Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: DURING A PERI-VALVULAR LEAK CASE, THE NAVICROSS WAS PUSHED THROUGH THE LEAK, BEHIND THE VALVE AND INTO THE LEFT VENTRICLE. THE WIRE WAS EXCHANGED FOR A SAFARI WIRE. THE NAVICROSS WAS PULLED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE BODY. THERE WAS SOME DIFFICULTY PULLING THE NAVICROSS OUT. AFTER REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTICED THAT A MARKER BAND WAS LEFT ON THE WIRE. ATTEMPTS TO SNARE IT OUT WERE MADE. EVENTUALLY THE MARKER BAND ENDED UP IN THE VENTRICLE BEHIND SOME PAPILLARY MUSCLE. THE PATIENT WILL BE BROUGHT BACK IN A FEW WEEKS TO ATTEMPT CLOSURE OF PERIVAVULAR LEAK AGAIN. THE ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS WAS LESS THAN 250CC. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 04FEB2026:SL: THE PATIENT WAS STABLE, AND THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24492480 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2025Break; Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: A VASCULAR SURGEON WAS DOING A PERIPHERAL CASE. GROIN ACCESS AND SHEATH WAS UP AND OVER. THE NAVICROSS 035 WAS DOWN LEG AND THERE WAS A 035 GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE IN THE NAVICROSS 035. THE DOCTOR WAS TRYING TO TAKE THE NAVICROSS OUT OVER THE WIRE AND IT WAS HARD TO REMOVE. THE DOCTOR HELD ON TO THE PORT OF THE NAVICROSS AND IT PULLED OFF. THEN HE GOT THE HEMOSTATS AND TRIED TO PULL THE NAVICROSS OUT AND THAT PIECE BROKE OFF. HE PULLED AGAIN AND THE REST OF THE NAVICROSS CAME OUT. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 03NOV2025: THE NAVICROSS BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. ALL OF THE CATHETER WAS RETRIEVED BY ADVANCING A SHEATH DILATOR TO PUSH OUT THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE NAVICROSS THROUGH A PEDAL SHEATH. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23655663 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2025Break; Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: A VASCULAR SURGEON WAS DOING A PERIPHERAL CASE. GROIN ACCESS AND SHEATH WAS UP AND OVER. THE NAVICROSS 035 WAS DOWN LEG AND THERE WAS A 035 GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE IN THE NAVICROSS 035. THE DOCTOR WAS TRYING TO TAKE THE NAVICROSS OUT OVER THE WIRE AND IT WAS HARD TO REMOVE. THE DOCTOR HELD ON TO THE PORT OF THE NAVICROSS AND IT PULLED OFF. THEN HE GOT THE HEMOSTATS AND TRIED TO PULL THE NAVICROSS OUT AND THAT PIECE BROKE OFF. HE PULLED AGAIN AND THE REST OF THE NAVICROSS CAME OUT. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 03NOV2025: THE NAVICROSS BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. ALL OF THE CATHETER WAS RETRIEVED BY ADVANCING A SHEATH DILATOR TO PUSH OUT THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE NAVICROSS THROUGH A PEDAL SHEATH. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23655661 ↗InjuryOct 8, 2024Migration; Migration
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE METAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER FROM THE DEVICE WAS STUCK ON THE PATIENT'S TAVR VALVE STRUT AND GOT DISLODGED FROM THE CATHETER WHEN REMOVED. THE MARKER FLOATED AWAY FROM THE INITIAL POSITION AND ENDED UP LODGED IN THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE CIRCUMFLEX CORONARY ARTERY. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS REPORTED WAS A LEFT HEART CAUTERIZATION (LHC) PERFORMED TO IDENTIFY THE AREA WHERE IT IS WAS LODGED AND POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS DEPARTMENT REVIEWER COMMENTS / ACTIONS PATIENT WAS HAVING A PARAVALVULAR LEAK CLOSURE PROCEDURE AND DURING THE CASE, A CATHETER MARKER FROM A NAVICROSS CATHETER DISLODGED. A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION WAS PERFORMED TO CHECK FOR POSITION OF DISLODGED PART ON FLUOROSCOPY. THE MARKER WAS NOTED TO BE LODGED IN THE DISTAL CIRCUMFLEX AND IN STABLE POSITION WITH NO CURRENT HARM AT THE TIME AND GOOD BLOOD FLOW WAS NOTED. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE DURING THE PROCEDURE AND TRANSFERRED OUT OF HYBRID OPERATING ROOM (OR) TO POST-ANESTHESIA CARE UNIT (PACU) IN STABLE CONDITION AFTER SUCCESSFUL PVL CLOSURE PROCEDURE. THE MARKER ENDED UP IN THE CAROTID OF THE PATIENT. THEY WERE ABLE TO GET THE MARKER AND SAVE THE PATIENT. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 20397822 ↗InjuryOct 8, 2024Migration; Migration
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE METAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER FROM THE DEVICE WAS STUCK ON THE PATIENT'S TAVR VALVE STRUT AND GOT DISLODGED FROM THE CATHETER WHEN REMOVED. THE MARKER FLOATED AWAY FROM THE INITIAL POSITION AND ENDED UP LODGED IN THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE CIRCUMFLEX CORONARY ARTERY. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS REPORTED WAS A LEFT HEART CAUTERIZATION (LHC) PERFORMED TO IDENTIFY THE AREA WHERE IT IS WAS LODGED AND POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS DEPARTMENT REVIEWER COMMENTS / ACTIONS PATIENT WAS HAVING A PARAVALVULAR LEAK CLOSURE PROCEDURE AND DURING THE CASE, A CATHETER MARKER FROM A NAVICROSS CATHETER DISLODGED. A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION WAS PERFORMED TO CHECK FOR POSITION OF DISLODGED PART ON FLUOROSCOPY. THE MARKER WAS NOTED TO BE LODGED IN THE DISTAL CIRCUMFLEX AND IN STABLE POSITION WITH NO CURRENT HARM AT THE TIME AND GOOD BLOOD FLOW WAS NOTED. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE DURING THE PROCEDURE AND TRANSFERRED OUT OF HYBRID OPERATING ROOM (OR) TO POST-ANESTHESIA CARE UNIT (PACU) IN STABLE CONDITION AFTER SUCCESSFUL PVL CLOSURE PROCEDURE. THE MARKER ENDED UP IN THE CAROTID OF THE PATIENT. THEY WERE ABLE TO GET THE MARKER AND SAVE THE PATIENT. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 20397661 ↗InjuryAug 23, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR PERFORMED AN INTERVENTION AND ANGIOPLASTY ON THE DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA), POPLITEAL, AND TIBIAL ARTERIES. THERE WAS A VERY TIGHT LESION THAT PRESENTED DIFFICULTIES IN CROSSING, AND SHE USED THE .035X135 ANGLED NAVICROSS AGGRESSIVELY, ALONG WITH VARIOUS WIRES. THE DISTAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER OF THE NAVICROSS DETACHED FROM THE CATHETER AND LODGED IN THE DISTAL ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. THIS DID NOT OBSTRUCT BLOOD FLOW, AND THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED NOT TO REMOVE IT. THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS A RIGHT LEG PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE (PAD) INTERVENTION, WITH NO BLOOD LOSS REPORTED. THE INCIDENT OCCURRED INTRA-OPERATIVE. THE REPORTED INCIDENT DID NOT RESULT IN PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 20058007 ↗InjuryAug 23, 2024Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR PERFORMED AN INTERVENTION AND ANGIOPLASTY ON THE DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA), POPLITEAL, AND TIBIAL ARTERIES. THERE WAS A VERY TIGHT LESION THAT PRESENTED DIFFICULTIES IN CROSSING, AND SHE USED THE .035X135 ANGLED NAVICROSS AGGRESSIVELY, ALONG WITH VARIOUS WIRES. THE DISTAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER OF THE NAVICROSS DETACHED FROM THE CATHETER AND LODGED IN THE DISTAL ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. THIS DID NOT OBSTRUCT BLOOD FLOW, AND THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED NOT TO REMOVE IT. THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS A RIGHT LEG PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE (PAD) INTERVENTION, WITH NO BLOOD LOSS REPORTED. THE INCIDENT OCCURRED INTRA-OPERATIVE. THE REPORTED INCIDENT DID NOT RESULT IN PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 20056137 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
THE TERUMO MEDICAL FACILITY RECEIVED A MEDWATCH REPORT NUMBER MW5067375 ON FEBRUARY 3, 2017. THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE NAVICROSS DEVICE BROKE OFF DURING A PROCEDURE. FOLLOW UP COMMUNICATION WITH THE USER FACILITY CONFIRMED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: DURING A COMMON FEMORAL INTERVENTION THE TIP OF THE NAVICROSS BROKE OFF INSIDE OF THE VESSEL; IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE VESSEL WAS VERY CALCIFIED AND THE NAVICROSS BECAME STUCK; UPON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TIP BROKE OFF; THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED BUT THE TIP REMAINED IN THE PATIENT; THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED; AND THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL FOR SURGICAL REMOVAL OF THE NAVICROSS TIP.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 6329941 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page