Skip to content

SENSAR IOL AR40M (REF AR40MN0070)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · ACRY 13.5mm 6 OPT MOD C PMMA OPTIEDGE · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SENSAR IOL (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474501751), received between Nov 1, 2018 and Apr 29, 2021 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 29, 2021Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) SPLIT IN HALF WHILE IN THE INSERTER DURING SURGERY. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE LENS CAME INTO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT'S EYE. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL SURGICAL INTERVENTION PERFORMED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE LENS WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11743135 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 1, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN AR40M, 7.0 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS INSERTED INTO THE EYE, AND WAS THEN NOTICED TO HAVE THE LEAD HAPTIC PUNCHED AND BROKEN. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE SAME MODEL LENS. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED, NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY AND NO SUTURES PERFORMED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8027207 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page