SENSAR IOL AR40e (REF AR40E00160)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · AMO Sensar AR40e Lens · Class 3 · Implant
All models of SENSAR IOL (112)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474502024), received between Aug 22, 2017 and Jan 8, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (9 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break9
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- No Code Available2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Vitrectomy2
- Endophthalmitis1
- Visual Impairment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NON-PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS OPENED AND REMOVED FROM A PATIENT DUE TO A BROKEN HAPTIC. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24016624 ↗MalfunctionNov 13, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT HAPTIC WAS DAMAGED AND THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23547820 ↗MalfunctionJul 5, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD DEFECTIVE HAPTICS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19684998 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS BROKEN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19601301 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS FULLY INSERTED AND THEN REMOVED IN PIECES AFTER DOCTOR NOTICED THE SMALL TEAR NOTED ON THE SURFACE OF POSTERIOR IOL. IT WAS REPLACED WITH THE BACK-UP IOL, SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER SIZE. NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, NO SUTURES DONE. PATIENT WAS WELL POST-OP, NO POST-OP INJURY. SUSPECT IOL DISCARDED AS IT IS ALREADY IN PIECES. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16940262 ↗MalfunctionApr 5, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DEFECTIVE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14016000 ↗InjuryAug 16, 2019Break; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Break; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SURGEON HAD TO REMOVE A LENS THAT WAS INSERTED UPSIDE DOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED, AND IT WAS LEARNT THAT THE LENS WAS INSERTED, REMOVED AND REPLACED IN SAME SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THE HAPTIC BROKE WHILE TRYING TO ROTATE THE LENS. THERE WAS PLANNED VITRECTOMY PERFORMED. REPORTEDLY THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. PATIENT WAS DOING WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Vitrectomy
MAUDE report 8900815 ↗MalfunctionMar 12, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN AR40E 16.0 DIOPTER MONOFOCAL LENS HAPTIC SNAPPED WHILE THE DOCTOR USED A HOOK TO UNFOLD THE LENS AND SET IT IN THE RIGHT SPOT. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT. SUTURES WERE USED BUT WERE ALREADY PLANNED. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT IS IN GOOD CONDITION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8410802 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED ENDOPHTHALMITIS AND POSTERIOR CAPSULAR OPACIFICATION (PCO) POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER THE IMPLANTATION OF AN AR40E 16.0 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). REPORTEDLY, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO SEE ANY ISSUES FOR THE FIRST WEEK POST-OPERATIVELY AND THE SYMPTOMS WORSENED TO UNAIDED VISUAL ACUITY 0.2. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Endophthalmitis; No Code Available; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 8333396 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2017Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), ONE HAPTIC BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT'S EYE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Vitrectomy
MAUDE report 6809407 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page