Skip to content

SENSAR IOL AR40e (REF AR40E00160)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · AMO Sensar AR40e Lens · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SENSAR IOL (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474502024), received between Aug 22, 2017 and Jan 8, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (9 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break9
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • No Code Available2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Vitrectomy2
  • Endophthalmitis1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NON-PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS OPENED AND REMOVED FROM A PATIENT DUE TO A BROKEN HAPTIC. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24016624 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT HAPTIC WAS DAMAGED AND THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23547820 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD DEFECTIVE HAPTICS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19684998 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS BROKEN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19601301 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 16, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS FULLY INSERTED AND THEN REMOVED IN PIECES AFTER DOCTOR NOTICED THE SMALL TEAR NOTED ON THE SURFACE OF POSTERIOR IOL. IT WAS REPLACED WITH THE BACK-UP IOL, SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER SIZE. NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, NO SUTURES DONE. PATIENT WAS WELL POST-OP, NO POST-OP INJURY. SUSPECT IOL DISCARDED AS IT IS ALREADY IN PIECES. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16940262 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 5, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DEFECTIVE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14016000 ↗
  • InjuryAug 16, 2019Break; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Break; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SURGEON HAD TO REMOVE A LENS THAT WAS INSERTED UPSIDE DOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED, AND IT WAS LEARNT THAT THE LENS WAS INSERTED, REMOVED AND REPLACED IN SAME SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THE HAPTIC BROKE WHILE TRYING TO ROTATE THE LENS. THERE WAS PLANNED VITRECTOMY PERFORMED. REPORTEDLY THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. PATIENT WAS DOING WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Vitrectomy

    MAUDE report 8900815 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN AR40E 16.0 DIOPTER MONOFOCAL LENS HAPTIC SNAPPED WHILE THE DOCTOR USED A HOOK TO UNFOLD THE LENS AND SET IT IN THE RIGHT SPOT. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT. SUTURES WERE USED BUT WERE ALREADY PLANNED. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT IS IN GOOD CONDITION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8410802 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED ENDOPHTHALMITIS AND POSTERIOR CAPSULAR OPACIFICATION (PCO) POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER THE IMPLANTATION OF AN AR40E 16.0 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). REPORTEDLY, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO SEE ANY ISSUES FOR THE FIRST WEEK POST-OPERATIVELY AND THE SYMPTOMS WORSENED TO UNAIDED VISUAL ACUITY 0.2. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Endophthalmitis; No Code Available; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 8333396 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), ONE HAPTIC BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT'S EYE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Vitrectomy

    MAUDE report 6809407 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page