Skip to content

SENSAR IOL AR40e (REF AR40E00260)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · AMO Sensar AR40e Lens · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SENSAR IOL (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474502222), received between Aug 25, 2016 and Nov 6, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break7

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Capsular Bag Tear1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A NON-PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD A BENT TRAILING HAPTIC. THE LENS WAS REMOVED FROM PATIENT'S EYE AND NOT USED. PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23490366 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 5, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NON-PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT BUT EXHIBITED HAPTIC MEMORY. AS A RESULT, THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP, WE LEARNED THAT THE LENS WAS REMOVED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. A REPLACEMENT IOL WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. ACCOUNT INDICATED THAT WHEN THE LENS CAME OUT OF THE CARTRIDGE DURING THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE HAPTIC WAS BENT AND DID NOT RETURN TO ITS NORMAL POSITION, WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO BE LIKE AN 'S', AND IT REMAINED CROOKED. THE IOL ENDED UP OUT OF POSITION AND NEEDED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S EYE. THE EMERALD CARTRIDGE AND OPHTHALMIC VISCOSURGICAL DEVICE (OVD) WERE ALSO USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT IS WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21318111 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 17, 2024Break; Break

    IT IS REPORTED THAT THE NON-PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS GOT A HAPTIC DAMAGED (BENT) AFTER DELIVERY DURING MANIPULATION WHEN TRYING TO PLACE IT INTO THE EYE. LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED BY ANOTHER COMPANY MANUFACTURED LENS. THE PATIENT¿S OUTCOME IS FINE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19554941 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 13, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LENS WAS DEFECTIVE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16535014 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HAPTIC OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) SNAPPED/ CRIMPED UPON INSERTION INTO PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE. THE CARTRIDGE TIP MADE CONTACT WITH THE EYE. THE LENS WAS INSERTED AND REMOVED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. THE ORIGINAL LENS WAS DISCARDED. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15696311 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 19, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (MODEL AR40E) WAS DEFECTIVE AND THE HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7613424 ↗
  • InjuryAug 25, 2016Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IOL (INTRAOCULAR LENS) IMPLANT, THERE WAS DETACHMENT OF THE FIRST HAPTIC FROM THE OPTIC ZONE. IT HAS CAUSED A POSTERIOR CAPSULE BREAK. THE PRODUCT IS AVAILABLE FOR INVESTIGATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear

    MAUDE report 5905255 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page