Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZA9003 (REF ZA90030100)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS Acry 13.omm 6OPT MODC PMMA OPTIEG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474528819), received between Feb 24, 2017 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 19, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE NON PRE-LOADED ZA9003 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR DEXTER (RIGHT EYE). POST-OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT HAD A SUBLUXATION/DISLOCATION OF THE LENS, THUS THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER ZA9003 10.0 DIOPTER IOL. SYMPTOMS PERSISTED FOR 4.5 YEARS. DURING THE LENS EXCHANGE PROCEDURE, THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, SUTURES, NOR VITRECTOMY. THE IOL DIRECTIONS FOR USE WERE FOLLOWED. THE FOLLOWING ARE ALL UNKNOWNS: WHETHER PATIENT'S DAILY ACTIVITIES WERE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED, PROCEDURE DELAYS, MEDICATION PRESCRIBED (OUTSIDE OF STANDARD CARE), OR IF MEDICAL ATTENTION WAS REQUIRED. PATIENT STATUS POST LENS EXCHANGE WAS REPORTED AS FULLY RECOVERED. PATIENT INFORMATION CANNOT BE PROVIDED DUE TO PERSONAL DATA PRIVACY LEGISLATION/POLICY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 20720372 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 24, 2017Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR PLACED THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IN THE SULCUS DUE TO AN ANTERIOR RANT (NO VITREOUS LOSS). AFTER THE IOL WAS INJECTED, THE DOCTOR NOTICED A SCRATCH ON THE LENS. THE SCRATCH WAS OFF CENTER. AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN LOADED THE LENS AND THE DOCTOR DOESN¿T BELIEVE THE TECHNICIAN DAMAGED THE LENS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6357001 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page