Skip to content

TECNIS CL IOL Z9002 (REF Z900200090)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS CL MONO 13MM 9.0 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS CL IOL (42)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474530478), received between Oct 22, 2018 and Dec 13, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 13, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A Z9002 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S EYE. REASON FOR EXPLANT IS UNKNOWN/NOT PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9468705 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 22, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS USED AS A SCLERAL FIXATION INTRAOCULAR LENS. REPORTEDLY, THE PHYSICIAN HAD ISSUE WITH THE HAPTIC AFTER INSERTION WHERE THE HAPTIC WAS REPORTED AS MELTED TOO SHORT. THE LENS WAS INSERTED, REMOVED AND REPLACED WITHIN THE SAME SURGICAL PROCEDURE WITHOUT PATIENT INJURY OR COMPLICATIONS. UPON RECEIPT AND EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE HAPTIC WAS DAMAGED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7993009 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page