TECNIS IOL ZCB00 (REF ZCB0000105)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS 1-PC CLEAR MONO 6.0MM 10.5D · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474531529), received between Oct 25, 2016 and Nov 4, 2020 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Break1
- Detachment Of Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Code Available4
- Blurred Vision1
- Visual Disturbances1
- Visual Impairment1
- Vitrectomy1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING BLURRED VISION AND SEE''S RAYS LIKE A SWORD OF LIGHT WHEN HE DRIVES AT NIGHT WITH AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IN THE LEFT EYE. ABOUT TWO WEEKS AFTER SURGERY IN THE SECOND EYE (RIGHT EYE), THE PATIENT STARTED DRIVING AT NIGHT AND NOTICED THE HEADLIGHTS ON ON-COMING TRAFFIC LOOKED LIKE RAYS OF LIGHT COMING OFF OF IT. THE VISUAL ISSUE SIGNIFICANTLY INTERFERES WITH NIGHT DRIVING. THE PATIENT IS SCHEDULED TO HAVE A LASER TREATMENT ON (B)(6) 2020. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION. PATIENT HAD BILATERAL LENS IMPLANTS. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE LENS IMPLANTED IN PATIENTS LEFT EYE. A SEPARATE REPORT WILL BE FILED FOR THE RIGHT EYE.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 10783503 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT COULD NOT SEE WELL WITH THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), THEREFORE, THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE. THERE WAS NO VITRECTOMY, INCISION ENLARGEMENT OR SUTURES REQUIRED. ANOTHER LENS (SAME MODEL AND LOWER DIOPTER) WAS IMPLANTED AS A REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE POST-OPERATIVELY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 9635247 ↗InjuryApr 17, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A CHANGE IN PATIENT ANATOMY AND THERE WAS NO ISSUE WITH THE LENS. HOWEVER, A VITRECTOMY WAS REQUIRED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE VITRECTOMY OCCURRED PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT OR DURING PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Vitrectomy
MAUDE report 8525230 ↗InjuryMar 21, 2017Break; Detachment Of Device Component; Break; Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HAPTIC OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) BROKE OFF DURING IMPLANTATION INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS, MODEL UNKNOWN, WITH SMALLER DIOPTER (+10,0 DIOPTER). REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS A DELAY IN THE SURGERY PROCEDURE AND THE PATIENT NEEDED SUTURES. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6423008 ↗InjuryOct 25, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A HYPEROPIC SURPRISE. THE ZCB00 10.5 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016 AND WAS REPLACED WITH THE SAME MODEL ZCB00 LENS, A LARGER 20.5 DIOPTER. PATIENT'S VISION IMPROVED AFTER IOL EXCHANGE AND PATIENT IS HAPPY WITH SURGERY OUTCOME. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY WAS REQUIRED. VISUAL ACUITY PRE-OP (PRE-INITIAL IMPLANT): SC (SANS CORRECTED) (20/40-2). VISUAL ACUITY POST-OP (POST-INITIAL IMPLANT): SC (CF) (COUNTING FINGERS)PINHOLE: 20/70. VISUAL ACUITY POST-OP (POST-REPLACEMENT): SC (20/50). TREATMENT OR PRESCRIPTION GIVEN BY THE DOCTOR: BESIVANCE, LOTEMAX GEL, PROLENSA.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6056188 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page