TECNIS IOL ZCB00 (REF ZCB0000270)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS 1-PC CLEAR MONO 6.0MM 27.0D · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474531857), received between Sep 12, 2016 and Aug 29, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Crack1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Code Available6
- Blurred Vision1
- Halo1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
- Unspecified Eye / Vision Problem1
- Vitrectomy1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 29, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A FEMALE PATIENT REPORTED HAVING A NON-PRELOADED MONOFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IN HER LEFT EYE, WITH ASTIGMATISM NOT YET CORRECTED IN THAT EYE. THE PATIENT ALSO HAS A NON-PRELOADED MONOFOCAL IOL IN HER RIGHT EYE. DURING A VISIT WITH A SECOND DOCTOR ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT WAS TOLD SHE HAS ASTIGMATISM IN HER LEFT EYE, AND THE DOCTOR RECOMMENDED CORRECTION TO IMPROVE HER VISION. THE PATIENT STATED THAT SHE HAS NOT EXPERIENCED ANY ISSUES WITH HER LEFT EYE (OS), THOUGH SHE STILL REQUIRES READERS. SHE PRIMARILY EXPERIENCES DRY EYE IN BOTH EYES, MANAGED WITH OVER-THE-COUNTER EYE DROPS. HER DISTANCE VISION IS FINE, AND HER CURRENT PRESCRIPTION FOR THE LEFT EYE IS SPHERE: -0.75, CYLINDER: +0.75, AXIS: 125 DEGREES. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT HER INITIAL VISIT WAS FOR ISSUES IN HER RIGHT EYE, INCLUDING SEEING SPIDER WEBS AND SQUIGGLY LINES THAT MOVED IN ONE SIDE OF HER RIGHT EYE ¿SPECIFICALLY, ONE WEB AND A LINE THAT REMAINED STATIONARY IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE VISUAL FIELD. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT CATARACT SURGERY IN BOTH EYES IN 2023. A FEW MONTHS AFTER HER RIGHT EYE SURGERY, SHE EXPERIENCED NUMEROUS SPIDER WEBS, WHICH IMPAIRED HER VISION. IN FEBRUARY 2023, YTTRIUM-ALUMINUM-GARN
Patient problems: Unspecified Eye / Vision Problem
MAUDE report 22926180 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE IMPLANT OF A TECNIS MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS IN THE RIGHT EYE IN (B)(6) 2019 BY ANOTHER SURGEON. EMMETROPIA WAS TARGETED. IT WAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE TECNIS MONOFOCAL AND A RAYNER SULCOFLEX TRIFOCAL LENS WERE USED, AND BOTH LENSES REMAIN IMPLANTED TOGETHER IN THE RIGHT EYE. THE VISUAL ACUITY REACHED POST-OP WAS 0.63 (SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION) WITH -3.0 DIOPTER (DPT) CYLINDER (CYL) WITH SPHERE (SPH) ZERO (0) IN THE RIGHT EYE AND THE OBJECTIVE REFRACTION WITH THE LEFT EYE IS SPH + 2.5 DPT CYL -0.5 50°. THE PATIENT IS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE RESULT IN THE RIGHT EYE AND REQUESTS AN IMPLANT IN THE LEFT EYE. THE PATIENT IS AN ENGINEER IN MICROELECTRONICS, AND ALSO MICROSCOPE REFLECTIVE COMPONENTS, AND CAN DO THIS POORLY WITH THE RIGHT EYE, AS THESE REFLECT AND CAUSE HALOS. THIS DISTURBS HIM SIGNIFICANTLY AND HE NOW RELIES INCREASINGLY ON HIS LEFT EYE WHEN MICROSCOPING. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP WE LEARNED THAT THE PATIENT¿S SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION ON THE OPERATED RIGHT EYE IS AT -3.0 DIOPTER WITH A TARGET OF 0 DIOPTER. THE SURGEON PLANS TO IMPLANT AN EYEHANCE LENS IN THE LEFT EYE, BUT NO PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN PERFORMED IN EITHER EYE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMAT
Patient problems: Halo; No Code Available
MAUDE report 9994482 ↗MalfunctionFeb 19, 2019Material Twisted/Bent; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Material Twisted/Bent; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZCB00 27.0 INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS STUCK IN THE PACKAGE AND BENT INSIDE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8349719 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2018Crack; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Crack; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT MODEL A MODEL ZCB00 TECNIS MONOFOCAL IOL (INTRAOCULAR LENS) WAS OBSERVED CRACKED AND TORN ON EACH SIDE AFTER IMPLANTING IN PATIENT'S EYE. REPORTEDLY, THE CUSTOMER USED A NON-JOHNSON & JOHNSON INJECTION SYSTEM. LENS WAS IMPLANTED AND LEFT IN THE CAPSULAR BAG AND IS EXPECTED TO BE EXCHANGED, BUT NO DEFINITE DATE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED YET. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THE CUSTOMER HAS BEEN ADVISED TO USE JOHNSON AND JOHNSON INJECTIONS SYSTEMS WITH THE LENSES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8096608 ↗InjuryMay 22, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TECNIS MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (MODEL ZCB00, +27.0 DIOPTER) WAS EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE BECAUSE OF PATIENT EXPERIENCING DECREASED VISION AND NEEDED A DIFFERENT DIOPTER. DURING THE PROCEDURE SUTURES WERE USED. CUSTOMER CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. PATIENT WAS DOING GOOD AT DISCHARGE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7535937 ↗InjuryJan 30, 2018Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZCB00 27.0 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE. IT WAS LATER EXPLANTED DUE TO UNEXPECTED MYOPIC OUTCOME. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7229874 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER A ZCB00 27.0 DIOPTER WAS IMPLANTED, THE DOCTOR NOTICED A VITREAL TEAR AND HAD TO PERFORM A VITRECTOMY. THE DOCTOR REPLACED IT WITH A DIFFERENT LENS DURING THE SAME SURGERY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Vitrectomy
MAUDE report 6829238 ↗InjurySep 12, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZCB00 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGERY FROM A FEMALE PATIENT'S RIGHT (OD) EYE. THE PATIENT HAD DIFFICULTIES WITH LENS (BLURRY VISION WHICH GOT WORSE) POST IMPLANT. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, VITRECTOMY, OR SUTURES REQUIRED AT EXPLANT AND NO PATIENT INJURY POST-OP WAS REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; No Code Available
MAUDE report 5944885 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page