Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZCB00 (REF ZCB0000305)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS 1-PC CLEAR MONO 6.0MM 30.5D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474531925), received between Apr 2, 2018 and Jun 9, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Capsular Bag Tear1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1
  • Vitrectomy1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A NON-PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS CRACKED DURING INSERTION AND WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25446214 ↗
  • InjuryMar 31, 2020Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZCB00 IOL 30.5 DIOPTER WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE. AFTER INSERTION THE DOCTOR NOTICED A TEAR IN THE LENS. THE IOL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE WITH THE SAME MODEL. THE INCISION WAS ENLARGED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9908582 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANTATION OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) A TEAR WAS NOTICED IN THE CAPSULAR BAG AND THE LENS HAD TO BE REMOVED FROM THE EYE. REPORTEDLY THE LENS WAS FULLY INSERTED AND REMOVED WITHOUT ENLARGING THE INCISION. A VITRECTOMY WAS REQUIRED. A REPLACEMENT LENS (MODEL AND DIOPTER UNKNOWN) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE SULCUS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DOING WELL POST-OPERATIVELY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear; Vitrectomy

    MAUDE report 7389303 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page