TECNIS IOL ZMA00 (REF ZMA00U0165)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS MF 3- PIECE 6.0MM 16.5 US · Class 3 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 05050474536739), received between Dec 10, 2023 and Dec 10, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Scratched Material1
Patient problems
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Visual Impairment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 10, 2023Break; Scratched Material; Break; Scratched Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT WHO DEVELOPED DOUBLE VISION FROM A DEFECT ON THE OPTIC (LOOKS LIKE A SCRATCH MAYBE LOADING) AND A WONKY HAPTIC. THE DOCTOR NOTED THAT HE NEEDS TO EXCHANGE. IT WAS STATED THAT THE LENS IMPLANTED IS A +16.5 BUT THE PATIENT WAS HYPEROPIC AND IOL WAS DECENTERED. FURTHER CLARIFICATION NOTED THAT THE DOCTOR THOUGHT ABOUT EXCHANGE FROM THE START BUT HE TRIED TO REPOSITION THE LENS AND RECHECKED OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER (ORA) WHICH SHOWED PLANO WITH THE IOL IN PLACE SO HE THOUGHT IT WAS GOOD. BUT THE PATIENT STILL MEASURES +1.00 TO +1.25 IN THE REAL WORLD EVEN SINCE HIS FIRST SURGERY. THE DOCTOR WAS GOING TO DO LASIK BUT HE CANNOT GET THE DOUBLE IMAGE TO GO AWAY EVEN IN A CONTACT LENS SO THE LENS WOULD NEED TO COME OUT ANYWAY. IT WAS NOTED LATER ON THAT EXPLANT OF IOL OCCURRED. NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, NO SUTURES DONE. NO COMPLICATIONS. THE REPLACEMENT LENS USED WAS SAME MODEL BUT 1.0 DIOPTER POWER SIZE HIGHER THAN THE ORIGINAL IO. THIS REPLACEMENT IOL HELPED ADDRESS THE VISUAL ISSUES OF THE PATIENT. PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 18298386 ↗
Other LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR devices
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular144 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular1 recall66 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular113 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular112 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular110 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular107 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular104 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular93 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.