Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZMA00 (REF ZMA00U0200)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS MF 3- PIECE 6.0MM 20.0 US · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474536807), received between Nov 7, 2016 and Aug 15, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unintended Movement” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available3
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Vitrectomy2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Eye Injury1
  • Halo1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 15, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THE ZMA00 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR SINISTER (LEFT EYE). DUE TO UNKNOWN REASONS, THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE. INFORMATION ABOUT THE REPLACEMENT IOL INFORMATION IS UNKNOWN. DURING THE LENS EXCHANGE PROCEDURE, THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, SERIOUS PATIENT INJURY, SUTURES, AND VITRECTOMY. PATIENT OUTCOME POST-LENS EXCHANGE WAS REPORTED AS LENS EXCHANGED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 19992837 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT EYE DUE TO PATIENT HAVING VISUAL GHOSTING ISSUES. THE SUSPECT IOL WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-JOHNSON AND JOHNSON IOL. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, NO SUTURES DONE. THE PATIENT IS NOTED TO BE DOING ALRIGHT. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 11586569 ↗
  • InjuryAug 26, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    RECEIVED REPORT THAT A ZMA00, 20.0 DIOPTER LENS WAS INSERTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE. THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY WOULD NOT HOLD THE IOL. THE LENS WAS REMOVED, AND NO REPLACEMENT LENS WAS IMPLANTED. A VITRECTOMY WAS PERFORMED. REPORTEDLY THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Vitrectomy

    MAUDE report 8931552 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2017Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZMA00 20.0 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM A FEMALE PATENT'S RIGHT EYE (OD) DUE TO A SUBLUXATION OF THE LENS. THROUGH FOLLOW UP IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING SUBLUXATION OF THE LENS OD (DECENTERED SUPEROTEMPORAL). PATIENT ALSO EXPERIENCE PAIN, FOREIGN BODY SENSATION, BLURRY VISION, LIGHT SENSITIVITY AND HALOS ON HER RIGHT EYE. THESE ISSUES HAVE AFFECTED HER DAILY ACTIVITIES. VISUAL ACUITY RIGHT EYE: SC 20/50 (SANS CORRECTED) PH 20/40 (PIN HOLE). VISUAL ACUITY LEFT EYE: SC 20/50 PHNI (PIN HOLE NO IMPROVEMENT).

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Halo; Pain

    MAUDE report 6382491 ↗
  • InjuryDec 8, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZMA00 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO PATIENT VISION NOT BEING GREAT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS ALSO EXPERIENCING GLARES. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 6155500 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2016Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED AS IT WAS NOT CENTERING PROPERLY AND WAS LIKELY DUE TO A CRIMPED OR DAMAGED HAPTIC. ANOTHER LENS, SAME MODEL WAS IMPLANTED AND THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DOING WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Vitrectomy

    MAUDE report 6084438 ↗

Other LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR devices

All LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page