Skip to content

SENSAR IOL AAB00 (REF AAB0000140)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SENSAR 1-PC CLEAR MONO 6.0MM 14.0D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SENSAR IOL (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474548541), received between Jan 10, 2019 and Jan 9, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Contamination1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Vitrectomy1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2020Contamination; Contamination

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD A FIBER LOOKING SUBSTANCE ATTACHED TO THE LENS THAT THE SURGEON COULD NOT REMOVE. THE LENS WAS INSERTED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED. ANOTHER LENS (SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER) WAS IMPLANTED AS A REPLACEMENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9571881 ↗
  • InjuryAug 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), MODEL AAB00, 14.0 DIOPTER WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE (OS) IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE AS THE PATIENT WAS NOT HAPPY WITH NEAR VISION IN THAT EYE. A REPLACEMENT LENS OF THE SAME MODEL, BUT A DIFFERENT DIOPTER (15.5) WAS USED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8882359 ↗
  • InjuryJan 10, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN AAB00 14.0 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS INSERTED AND REMOVED DURING THE SAME SURGICAL PROCEDURE BECAUSE A DEFECT/BREAK IN THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE LENS WAS FOUND AFTER IMPLANTATION. REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS A DELAY OF 20 MINUTES DUE TO THIS. ALSO, A VITRECTOMY AND INCISION ENLARGEMENT (FROM 2.2MM TO 3.0MM) WERE PERFORMED. THE PATIENT SHOWS NO ABNORMALITY AFTER SURGERY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Vitrectomy

    MAUDE report 8238281 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page