SENSAR IOL AAB00 (REF AAB0000255)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SENSAR 1-PC CLEAR MONO 6.0MM 25.5D · Class 3 · Implant
All models of SENSAR IOL (112)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474548770), received between Jan 13, 2017 and Apr 3, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Break1
- Calcified1
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Failure to Unfold or Unwrap1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Product Quality Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Code Available2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
- Visual Impairment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 3, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GOODS WERE DAMAGED AS PERTAINING TO THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24784015 ↗MalfunctionApr 4, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS ¿TORN¿ DURING INSERTION. THE ISSUE WAS IDENTIFIED DURING IMPLANTATION. A DELAY IN PROCEDURE OCCURRED AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS WERE MENTIONED. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP REVEALED THAT THE DELAY MENTIONED WAS NOT CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT. THE LENS WAS REMOVED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE AND THE PATIENT WILL UNDERGO A SECONDARY PROCEDURE TO IMPLANT A NEW IOL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21775897 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2019Calcified; Calcified
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SURGEON HAS IDENTIFIED CALCIFICATION OF THE LENS IMPLANTED FIVE YEARS AGO IN THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP IT WAS LEARNED THAT A MODEL AAB00 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED ON THE (B)(6) 2014. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY UNDERGOING CHEMO THERAPY BECAUSE SHE HAS A TUMOR ELSEWHERE IN THE BODY. THE ISSUE STARTED ABOUT HALF A YEAR AGO. THE LENS IS CLOUDED AT THE BACK, AND THE PATIENT'S CURRENT VISUAL ACUITY IS 50%. THE LENS IS STILL IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT'S EYE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 9173836 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2019Product Quality Problem; Product Quality Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SITE VISIT, THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE IDENTIFIED A SPELLING TYPING ERROR ON THE LENS MANUFACTURING LABEL WITH THE SENTENCE AS ''ONE PIECE ASPHERIC POSTERIOR CHAMBER BICONVEX IOL'' (INTRAOCULAR LENS). REPORTEDLY, IT IS WRITTEN ASPHERIC INSTEAD OF SPHERIC. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8600897 ↗InjuryMay 10, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IOL MODEL AAB00 25.5 DIOPTER WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO A POWER CHANGE (UNEXPECTED POSTOP REFRACTION). THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH MODEL AAB00 23.5 DIOPTER. VIA FOLLOW-UP THE CUSTOMER CONFIRMED THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE INITIAL LENS. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS OF ANY KIND. THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8598326 ↗InjuryApr 12, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MONOFOCAL LENS, MODEL AAB00, WAS IMPLANTED IN THE EYE OF A FEMALE PATIENT. THE TARGET, OF 0.0 DIOPTER, WAS MISSED BY -3.0 DIOPTERS. THE VISION WAS -2.0 DIOPTERS THE FIRST DAY POST-OP, -2.75 FOUR DAYS POST-OP, AND -3.0 LATER. REPORTEDLY, THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6488624 ↗MalfunctionJan 13, 2017Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INSERTION INTO THE EYE OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE CARTRIDGE. THE LENS WAS NOT SLIDING THROUGH THE CARTRIDGE EASILY AND IT WAS BEING SCARFED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND IT WAS LEARNT THAT WITH LENS SCARFED IT WAS MEANT THAT THE LENS REMAINED FOLDED ONCE INSERTED INTO THE EYE. THE LENS WAS CUT OUT AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS, SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER. NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT AND NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6251376 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page