TECNIS IOL ZKB00 (REF ZKB00U0115)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS MF 1- PC 6.0MM 11.5D LOW ADD US · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474559912), received between Mar 1, 2017 and Jun 12, 2020 — classified as 3 injuries.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
Patient problems
- No Code Available3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 12, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT LENS WAS EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10149160 ↗InjuryJul 20, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZKB00 11.5 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON AMO DEVICE. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT AND NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6729148 ↗InjuryMar 1, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZKB00 INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS EXPLANTED AS THE PATIENT WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE VISUAL OUTCOME. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO INJURY AND NO SUTURES REQUIRED. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL LENS.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6370898 ↗
Other LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR devices
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular144 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular1 recall66 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular113 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular112 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular110 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular107 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular104 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular93 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page