TECNIS IOL ZLB00 (REF ZLB00U0145)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS MF 1- PC 6.0MM 14.5D LOW ADD US · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474560567), received between Sep 20, 2016 and Dec 13, 2020 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
Patient problems
- No Code Available7
- Halo1
- Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected1
- Visual Disturbances1
- Visual Impairment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 13, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REPORT OF EXPLANT OF LENS IMPLANT FROM THE PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE DUE TO REFRACTIVE ERROR IN CALCULATION. IT WAS REPLACED WITH THE SAME MODEL NUMBER BUT HIGHER DIOPTER POWER (15.5) LENS. IT WAS LEARNED THAT THE SUSPECT PRODUCT WAS DISCARDED. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, NO SUTURES DONE. THE PATIENT WAS WELL POST-OP. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected
MAUDE report 10998891 ↗InjuryOct 9, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR DEXTER (RIGHT EYE). THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT LENS MODEL (ZXR00) AND DIFFERENT DIOPTER SIZE (14.0). NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10654176 ↗InjuryJan 2, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZLB00 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE ON (B)(6) 2019. IT WAS LATER EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO CONSTANT HALOS AND DIFFICULTY READING SMALL PRINT. NO SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. REPORTEDLY, PATIENT IS DOING FINE POST-EXCHANGE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Halo; No Code Available; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 9539597 ↗InjuryAug 25, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TECNIS 1 MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), MODEL ZLB00 14.5 DIOPTER, WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO POOR INTERMEDIATE AND READING VISION. THE REPLACEMENT LENS WAS A MODEL ZMB00 15.5 DIOPTER. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, VITRECTOMY, OR COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 6819675 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZLB00 14.5 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO PATIENT EXPERIENCING GLARES. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A ZCB00 IOL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6168706 ↗InjuryDec 2, 2016Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZLB00 14.5 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO PATIENT'S UNRESOLVED REFRACTIVE ERROR AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THE CURRENT IMPLANT POWER LENS. IMPLANT WAS REMOVED IN ONE PIECE. NO COMPLICATION OCCURRED DURING EXPLANTATION. ANOTHER TECNIS IMPLANT POWER LENS WAS USED AND REPLACED THE EXPLANTED LENS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6142520 ↗InjurySep 20, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZLB00 14.5 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO A HYPERMYOPTIC OUTCOME. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER ZLB00 LENS OF A LOWER DIOPTER (13.5). NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 5962210 ↗
Other LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR devices
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular144 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular1 recall66 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular113 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular112 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular110 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular107 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular104 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular93 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page