Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZXT375 (REF ZXT375U140)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SYMFONY TORIC ERV 14.0D CYL3.75 · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474606852), received between Feb 6, 2017 and Jun 2, 2018 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unintended Movement” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unintended Movement2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 2, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZXT375 14.0 DIOPTER LENS WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE (OD) ON (B)(6) 2017. IT WAS LATER EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2018 BECAUSE OF GLARE ISSUES AND WAS REPLACED WITH A ZCT300 MODEL LENS. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, AND NO SUTURES USED. REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE POST-OPERATIVELY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7563641 ↗
  • InjuryOct 16, 2017Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ZXT375 14.0 DIOPTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE LEFT EYE (OS) ON (B)(6) 2017 . IT WAS LATER EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO SUBLUXATION OF THE IOL WITH ANISOMETROPIA. ALSO, THE DOCTOR STATED THE ANISOMETROPIA INTERFERED WITH THE PATIENT'S REGULAR ACTIVITIES AND THE VISION WAS 20/70 POST-OPERATIVELY. THERE WAS AN INCISION ENLARGEMENT, BUT NO VITRECTOMY OR SUTURES USED. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-AMO LENS. REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS NO POST-OPERATIVE PATIENT INJURY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6953494 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2017Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD ROTATED 30 DEGREES. THE LENS WAS THEN EXPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6306125 ↗

Other Extended depth of focus intraocular lens devices

All Extended depth of focus intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page