Skip to content

SMARTLOAD GCB00 (REF GCB0000125)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SMARTLOAD TECNIS 1PC CLEAR MONO 12.5D · Class 3

All models of SMARTLOAD (52)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474620452), received between Aug 4, 2022 and Dec 23, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Contamination1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 23, 2025Contamination; Contamination

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF THE PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) 'FOREIGN MATERIAL' WAS OBSERVED COVERING THE TRAILING HAPTIC AND EDGE OF THE OPTIC IN THE REGION OF THE TRAILING HAPTIC. SOME OF THE MATERIAL WAS REMOVED WITH IRRIGATION/ASPIRATION, BUT SOME REMAINED WHICH LEAD TO THE LENS BEING CUT AND REMOVED. A REPLACEMENT LENS WAS INSERTED IN THE PATIENT'S EYE DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23885500 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LENS WAS DAMAGED. THE LENS WAS INTRODUCED NICELY FOLDED INTO THE EYE WITH NO ISSUES AND WAS FULLY INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE. THE DOCTOR THEN FOUND THE LENS DAMAGE AND THINKS IT MUST HAVE BEEN DAMAGED FROM THE START. THE MATERIAL NOT AVAILABLE FOR COLLECTION AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15169492 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page