Skip to content

SMARTLOAD GCB00 (REF GCB0000255)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SMARTLOAD TECNIS 1PC CLEAR MONO 25.5D · Class 3

All models of SMARTLOAD (52)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474620711), received between May 10, 2019 and Nov 6, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Contamination1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS NOT IMPLANTED AND WAS DAMAGED DURING THE INSERTION PROCESS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23493108 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2019Contamination; Contamination

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEBRIS WAS FOUND ON THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WHICH LOOKED LIKE A LONG SLENDER FLAKE ABOUT 1MM IN LENGTH. THE DEBRIS WAS NOT SOLID LIKE PLASTIC BUT MORE LIKE SOMETHING DRIED UP. THE DEBRIS WAS REMOVED WITH IRRIGATION/ASPIRATION (IA). THE DEBRIS DISINTEGRATED WITH I/A AND WAS SEEN WHEN THE IOL UNFOLDED. IT DISINTEGRATED WHEN THE SURGEON COMPLETED THE CASE WITH I/A WHICH IS STANDARD PROCEDURE AT THE END OF THE CATARACT PROCEDURE TO REMOVE ANY REMAINING OVD (OPHTHALMIC VISCOSURGICAL DEVICE) LEFT IN THE EYE FROM THE CASE. THERE WAS NO TREATMENT GIVEN FOR THIS AND THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT ISSUES CAUSED BY IT. PATIENT HAD RECOVERED. NO OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8601843 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page