SMARTLOAD GCB00 (REF GCB0000265)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SMARTLOAD TECNIS 1PC CLEAR MONO 26.5D · Class 3
All models of SMARTLOAD (52)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474620735), received between Jun 13, 2022 and Mar 28, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Contamination1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 28, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A POST-OPERATIVE EXAMINATION, DAMAGE TO THE OPTIC WAS DETECTED AFTER IMPLANTATION OF THE PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE IN THE INJECTOR DURING THE LOADING PROCESS. THE PATIENT HAS FULLY RECOVERED AND THE EVENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INTERVENTIONS. THROUGH FOLLOW UP, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT SIGNIFICANT. NO MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21723131 ↗MalfunctionOct 27, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DEFECTIVE WHEN OPENING THE PACKAGE. THE ISSUE WAS FIRST IDENTIFIED UPON OPENING OF THE PACKAGING AND THERE WAS NO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT'S EYE. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP WE LEARNED THAT THE LENS CAME CROOKED OUT OF THE CARTRIDGE AND THE LENS WAS BROKEN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18023504 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Contamination; Contamination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE LENS WAS IMPLANTED THE DOCTOR SAW A FOREIGN BODY SHAPED LIKE A RING. THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS REMOVED FROM THE EYE AND THE LENS REMAINS IMPLANTED. A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE WAS MENTIONED; HOWEVER, NO MEDICATION OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. NO IMPACT ON DAILY ACTIVITIES REPORTED AND THE PATIENT HAS FULLY RECOVERED. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14682567 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page