Skip to content

SMARTLOAD GCB00 (REF GCB0000265)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SMARTLOAD TECNIS 1PC CLEAR MONO 26.5D · Class 3

All models of SMARTLOAD (52)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474620735), received between Jun 13, 2022 and Mar 28, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Contamination1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A POST-OPERATIVE EXAMINATION, DAMAGE TO THE OPTIC WAS DETECTED AFTER IMPLANTATION OF THE PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE IN THE INJECTOR DURING THE LOADING PROCESS. THE PATIENT HAS FULLY RECOVERED AND THE EVENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INTERVENTIONS. THROUGH FOLLOW UP, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT SIGNIFICANT. NO MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21723131 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DEFECTIVE WHEN OPENING THE PACKAGE. THE ISSUE WAS FIRST IDENTIFIED UPON OPENING OF THE PACKAGING AND THERE WAS NO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT'S EYE. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP WE LEARNED THAT THE LENS CAME CROOKED OUT OF THE CARTRIDGE AND THE LENS WAS BROKEN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18023504 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Contamination; Contamination

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE LENS WAS IMPLANTED THE DOCTOR SAW A FOREIGN BODY SHAPED LIKE A RING. THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS REMOVED FROM THE EYE AND THE LENS REMAINS IMPLANTED. A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE WAS MENTIONED; HOWEVER, NO MEDICATION OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. NO IMPACT ON DAILY ACTIVITIES REPORTED AND THE PATIENT HAS FULLY RECOVERED. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14682567 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page