SMARTLOAD GCB00 (REF GCB0000270)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SMARTLOAD TECNIS 1PC CLEAR MONO 27.0D · Class 3
All models of SMARTLOAD (52)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474620742), received between Feb 21, 2023 and Apr 7, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Crack1
- Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
- Ejection Problem1
- Material Fragmentation1
- Scratched Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Eye Infections1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Ejection Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT LENS THE PRELOADED, MONOFOCAL, INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) MISFIRED DUE TO THE LENS STICKING DURING INJECTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24811336 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Crack; Material Fragmentation; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Crack; Material Fragmentation; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC RIM OF THE PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) SYSTEM BROKE, RESULTING IN A FRAGMENT OF THE CARTRIDGE BEING RELEASED INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED EXPERIENCING RESISTANCE WHILE ADVANCING THE LENS THROUGH THE CARTRIDGE. THEY NOTED THAT A SIMILAR INCIDENT HAD PREVIOUSLY OCCURRED. THE LENS ITSELF REMAINED INTACT AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED WITHOUT DAMAGE OR PATIENT INJURY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED. NOTE: THIS REPORT IS TO CAPTURE THE SIMILAR INCIDENT THAT OCCURRED PREVIOUSLY. A SEPARATE REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO CAPTURE THE CURRENT EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23846187 ↗InjuryJun 17, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON PERFORMED EIGHT CATARACT SURGERIES ON THE SAME DAY BEFORE EASTER. AT THE WEEKLY CHECK-UP EVERYTHING LOOKED FINE, BUT AT THE MONTHLY CHECK-UP THERE WAS A CLOUDY LIGHT PATH IN 3 EYES. WHEN TREATED WITH SPERSADEX IT DISAPPEARED QUICKLY. THE SURGEON DOES NOT SUSPECT OUR PRODUCTS AND HAS CHANGED EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE CHANGED. THROUGH FOLLOW UPS IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE 3 EYES WERE FROM 3 DIFFERENT PATIENTS. THROUGH FURTHER FOLLOW UP, WE LEARNED THAT 7 PATIENTS ARE INVOLVED AND THERE ARE 3 DIFFERENT EVENT DATES. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE CUSTOMER IS REPORTING INFECTION IN ALL 7 PATIENTS. HOWEVER, ON (B)(6), IT WAS LEARNED THAT THE SURGEON DOES NOT BELIEVE THIS INCIDENT IS RELATED TO THE IMPLANTED JOHNSON AND JOHNSON INTRAOCULAR LENSES (IOLS). THROUGH FOLLOW UP ON (B)(6), WE LEARNED IT WAS A MILD INFECTION, ALL PATIENTS RESPONDED FAST TO TOBRADEX EXCEPT ONE THAT TOOK A LITTLE MORE TIME. THERE IS NO MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR INVESTIGATION AS ALL IOLS REMAIN IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. NOTE: 6 ADDITIONAL REPORTS WILL BE FILED FOR THE OTHER 6 PATIENTS. THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 7.
Patient problems: Eye Infections
MAUDE report 22237906 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2023Scratched Material; Scratched Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A DENT ON THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). THE DOCTOR HAS PLACED THE LENS IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE PATIENT WILL NOT FEEL ANY DISCOMFORT. THROUGH FURTHER FOLLOW-UP THE DOCTOR CONFIRMED THAT THE IOL REMAINS IMPLANTED AND THE PATIENT HAS NO NEGATIVE IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16414499 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page