Skip to content

SMARTLOAD GAB00 (REF GAB0000205)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SMARTLOAD SENSAR 1PC CLEAR MONO 20.5D · Class 3

All models of SMARTLOAD (52)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474621794), received between Mar 12, 2025 and Apr 13, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack2
  • Break1
  • Contamination1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Mechanical Jam1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2026Crack; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC MATERIAL AT THE TIP OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) CARTRIDGE WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED AND HAD BROKEN OFF. THE MATERIAL WAS REMOVED BEFORE THE LENS WAS INSERTED, AND NO ADVERSE EFFECTS OR CLINICAL COMPLICATIONS WERE OBSERVED IN THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT DELAYED, NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTIONS WERE REQUIRED, AND THE PATIENT FULLY RECOVERED WITH DAILY ACTIVITIES UNAFFECTED. ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING LENS IMPLANTATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24867159 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2025Contamination; Contamination

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), A SMALL HAIR OR LINT WAS DISCOVERED. THE IOL WAS FULLY IMPLANTED. THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND THE PATIENT HAS FULLY RECOVERED. THROUGH FOLLOW UP, WE LEARNED THAT THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22561799 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 30, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DEFECTIVE, IT WAS TORN. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21936791 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2025Crack; Mechanical Jam; Crack; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANTATION OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE LENS BECAME STUCK IN THE CARTRIDGE, CAUSING THE CARTRIDGE TO BREAK AND MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO EXTRACT THE LENS. THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH A BACK UP LENS. THROUGH FOLLOW UP, WE LEARNED THAT THE DAMAGE WAS ON THE TIP OF THE CARTRIDGE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21638901 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2025Break; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Break; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) BROKE WHILE USING THE APPROPRIATE INJECTOR. THE PROCEDURE WAS THE SAME AS ALWAYS, FOLLOWING THE SPECIALIST'S INSTRUCTIONS. WHEN PUSHING THE LENS SLOWLY INTO THE CARTRIDGE, A GREATER FRICTION THAN USUAL WAS OBSERVED. ALTHOUGH THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO RECOVER THE LENS, IT WAS IRREVERSIBLY DAMAGED; THEREFORE, THE IOL WAS REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21590177 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page