Skip to content

SMARTLOAD GAB00 (REF GAB0000250)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · SMARTLOAD SENSAR 1PC CLEAR MONO 25.0D · Class 3

All models of SMARTLOAD (52)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474621886), received between Apr 7, 2022 and Apr 13, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack2
  • Contamination1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Mechanical Jam1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2026Crack; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC MATERIAL AT THE TIP OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) CARTRIDGE WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED AND HAD BROKEN OFF. THE MATERIAL WAS REMOVED BEFORE THE LENS WAS INSERTED, AND NO ADVERSE EFFECTS OR CLINICAL COMPLICATIONS WERE OBSERVED IN THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT DELAYED, NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTIONS WERE REQUIRED, AND THE PATIENT FULLY RECOVERED WITH DAILY ACTIVITIES UNAFFECTED. ISSUE WAS OBSERVED DURING LENS IMPLANTATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24867166 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 12, 2025Crack; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Mechanical Jam; Crack; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED BY SURGEON THAT THERE WAS RESISTANCE UPON INSERTION OF MONOFOCAL PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INSIDE PATIENT'S EYE. ACCOUNT REPORTED THAT THE CARTRIDGE TIP WAS PROBABLY BLOCKED AND LENS WAS COMING OUT AT THE SIDE OF THE TIP INSTEAD. CARTRIDGE TIP WAS IN CONTACT WITH PATIENT'S EYE. SUTURES WERE NOT REQUIRED. VITRECTOMY WAS NOT REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN PROCEDURE. END USER DIDN'T SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION. NO MEDICATIONS WERE PRESCRIBED. PATIENT IS FULLY RECOVERED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22006898 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 7, 2022Contamination; Contamination

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A METALLIC-LOOKING FRAGMENT, RETAINED BETWEEN THE IOL (INTRAOCULAR LENS) AND THE ANTERIOR LENS CAPSULE AND 2 PUNCTATE FRAGMENTS REFLECTIVE IN THE IRIS STROMA WERE OBSERVED. THE ISSUE WAS IDENTIFIED WITH THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE DURING A POST OPERATIVE EXAM. THERE WAS NO VITRECTOMY REQUIRED AND NO DELAY WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT REMAINS ASYMPTOMATIC AND THE REMOVAL OF THE INTRACAPSULAR FRAGMENT IS NOT PLANNED FOR NOW. THE POST-OP VISION WAS DESCRIBED AS GOOD, PATIENT HAS FULLY RECOVERED AND NO MEDICATION WAS PRESCRIBED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. THIS REPORT IS FOR THE INTRAOCULAR LENS DEVICE. SEPARATE REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE PHACO DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14039099 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page