Skip to content

TECNIS SIMPLICITY DCB00 (REF DCB0000095)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SMPLCTY TECNIS 1PC CLR MONO 9.5D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS SIMPLICITY (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474635876), received between Jul 12, 2021 and Jun 9, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Scratched Material2
  • Material Opacification1
  • Operating System Becomes Nonfunctional1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2025Break; Scratched Material; Break; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED BY SURGEON THAT A PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS HAD SCRATCHES THAT WERE NOTICED AFTER IMPLANTATION. VISCOELASTIC WAS LEAKING OUT FROM THE SIDE OF THE CARTRIDGE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22173138 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2024Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION ON THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE, A PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS SCRATCHED. THE SURGEON FELT THE PATIENT WILL HAVE NO VISUAL IMPACT SINCE IT WAS ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE LENS, THEREFORE, THE LENS REMAINS IMPLANTED. THE DAILY ACTIVITIES ARE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED. T HE PATIENT HAS FULLY RECOVERED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20928613 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2021Break; Operating System Becomes Nonfunctional; Break; Operating System Becomes Nonfunctional

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE INJECTION OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). THE PISTON OF THE INJECTOR DID NOT PUSH THE LENS. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS THE LENS WAS INJECTED BUT THE OPTIC WAS SLIGHTLY DAMAGED ON THE UPPER EDGE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12636282 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2021Material Opacification; Material Opacification

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER INSERTION OF A MODEL DCB00 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE, THERE WAS A LARGE CENTRAL OPACITY OBSERVED. THE LENS WAS REMOVED FROM THE EYE AND A NEW LENS WAS PLACED. THERE WAS DELAY IN PROCEDURE AND THE INCISION WAS ENLARGED TO REMOVE THE LENS FROM PATIENT'S EYE, BUT NO VITRECTOMY OR SUTURES WERE REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL DETAILS RECEIVED STATES THAT LENS WAS FULLY INSERTED AND REMOVED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE AS THE SURGEON FELT IT WOULD IMPAIR PATIENTS VISION. SUSPECT PRODUCT WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12155712 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page