TECNIS SIMPLICITY DCB00 (REF DCB0000260)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SMPLCTY TECNIS 1PC CLR MONO 26.0D · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS SIMPLICITY (112)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474636200), received between Dec 10, 2020 and Aug 25, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Crack2
- Contamination1
- Delivered as Unsterile Product1
- Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
- Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse1
- Failure to Advance1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Capsular Bag Tear1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 25, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50441877 ↗InjuryJul 9, 2026Break
IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE DURING A PROCEDURE. THE LENS WAS FULLY INSERTED AND SUBSEQUENTLY REMOVED WITHIN THE SAME PROCEDURE DUE TO THE OBSERVED ISSUE DURING THE DEVICE'S IMPLEMENTATION OR APPLICATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AND REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE LENS WAS REMOVED, HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT ATTRIBUTED TO A PRODUCT DEFECT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A RUPTURE OF THE INTRAOCULAR CAPTURE RESULTED IN MIGRATION OF THE LENS INTO THE POSTERIOR SEGMENT OF THE EYE. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PATIENT'S CLINICAL CONDITION, THE SURGEON ELECTED TO EXPLANT THE PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED LENS AND LEAVE THE PATIENT APHAKIC DURING THE HEALING PERIOD. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25773422 ↗MalfunctionNov 20, 2025Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse; Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS FOUND TO BE STIFF, AND THE HAPTICS WERE TAKING LONGER THAN USUAL TO UNFOLD IN THE EYE. THROUGH FOLLOW UP, WE LEARNED THAT ADDITIONAL SURGICAL MANEUVERS WERE REQUIRED TO POSITION THE IOL IN THE PATIENT'S EYE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THE DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23610107 ↗MalfunctionJun 10, 2025Scratched Material; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Scratched Material; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SURGEON THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS TORN OR SCRATCHED. THE ISSUE WAS NOTICED DURING IMPLANTATION/APPLICATION OF THE LENS. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT STATUS WAS TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22180548 ↗MalfunctionOct 3, 2023Crack; Crack
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED AND THE CARTRIDGE TIP WAS DEFECTIVE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, NO ADDITIONAL SURGERY STEPS WERE NEEDED. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP WE LEARNED THAT THE DEFECTIVE CARTRIDGE TIP WAS NOTICED DURING CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT'S EYE; HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS NOT AFFECTED OR INJURED IN ANY WAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17865878 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2023Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS NOT STERILE. THE LENS HAD NO PATIENT CONTACT AND THE SURGERY HAD TO BE CANCELLED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 17121943 ↗MalfunctionDec 28, 2021Break; Failure to Advance; Break; Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) DEVICE HAD A LOADING PROBLEM THAT LED TO THE LENS LEADING HAPTIC BEING KINKED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT WITH THE PRODUCT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13102490 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2021Crack; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Crack; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INJECTOR WAS BROKEN BUT THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT. ACCOUNT PROVIDED THAT THE CARTRIDGE TIP WAS IN CONTACT WITH THE EYE AND RESIDUE FROM A PIECE OF PLASTIC THAT BROKE-OFF GOT INTO THE PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO PROCEED WITH THE SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12841097 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2020Contamination; Contamination
AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE IT WAS REPORTED THE DOCTOR NOTICED A SMALL GRAY PARTICLE OR MATERIAL IN THE EYE. THE PARTICLE WAS EVACUATED RIGHT AWAY. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED CONFIRMING NO UNPLANNED INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO SERIOUS PATIENT INJURY, NO UNPLANNED SUTURE(S), NO UNPLANNED VITRECTOMY, THE REPORTED GREY PARTICLE, OR MATERIAL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS REPORTED AS EXCELLENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10988962 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page