Skip to content

TECNIS SIMPLICITY DCB00 (REF DCB0000290)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SMPLCTY TECNIS 1PC CLR MONO 29.0D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS SIMPLICITY (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474636262), received between Dec 30, 2020 and Nov 7, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Crack1
  • Mechanical Jam1

Patient problems

  • Discomfort1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 7, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), MODEL DCB00 WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE. THE PATIENT HAD TO HOLD THINGS REALLY CLOSE TO BE ABLE TO SEE ANYTHING. PATIENT NOT ABLE TO FUNCTION DUE TO MYOPIA AGGRAVATING HIS CENTRAL SCOTOMA. THE PATIENT HAS A HISTORY OF MYOPIC LASIK AND MULTIPLE RETINAL PROCEDURES, INCLUDING PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY (PPV) IN THE RIGHT EYE PRIOR TO CATARACT SURGERY. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED DURING A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE DUE TO PATIENT'S PREFERENCE TO CHANGE VISION TARGET FROM NEAR TO DISTANCE AND AS THE PATIENT DID NOT LIKE MYOPIA. THE REPLACEMENT LENS WAS THE SAME MODEL DCB00 WITH 24. 0 DIOPTER. THERE WERE NO CAPSULE TEAR, UNPLANNED VITRECTOMY , INCISION ENLARGEMENT AND SUTURES. FOLLOWING REPLACEMENT LENS IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT¿S VISUAL ACUITY (VA) WAS 20/400. THE MANIFEST REFRACTION (MRX) WAS -0.25 D SPHERE AND -0.50 D CYLINDER AT 135°, VA: 20/400. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL ATTENTION OR MEDICATION OUTSIDE OF STANDARD CARE WAS REQUIRED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE LENS DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE EVENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Discomfort

    MAUDE report 23503993 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2021Break; Mechanical Jam; Break; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A DCB00 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS(IOL) WAS DEFECTIVE, MADE POPPING SOUND AND AS DOCTOR TRIED TO IMPLANT THE LENS, BUT IT WOULDN'T COME OUT. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT AND NO PATIENT INJURY. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING BACKUP LENS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11822309 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 30, 2020Crack; Crack

    REPORT RECEIVED INDICATING THE CARTRIDGE OF THE DCB00 (PRELOADED DEVICE) CRACKED AS THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS BEING INSERTED INTO THE LEFT EYE. SURGEON NOTICED THE TIP WAS CRACKED WHILE INSERTING. THE IOL WAS PLACED IN ANOTHER CARTRIDGE AND WAS INSERTED IN THE EYE WITH NO PROBLEMS. NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT REQUIRED. THE IOL REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 11098757 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page