Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZCU150 (REF ZCU150U190)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS TORIC II 1-PC 19.0D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474657779), received between Jul 22, 2020 and Jul 7, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision1
  • Eye Injury1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 7, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED AN EXPLANT. ACCOUNT INDICATED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY AND THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE POST-OPERATION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 14951529 ↗
  • InjuryAug 12, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED/EXCHANGED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE DUE TO BLURRED VISUAL ACUITY OBSERVED DURING POST-OP EXAMINATION. THE EXPLANTED LENS WAS REPLACED WITH MODEL ZCU225 OF A HIGHER DIOPTER 18.5. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, AND NO SUTURES WERE REQUIRED. PATIENT OUTCOME SANS CORRECTION (SC) 20/30, PRE-OP VISUAL ACUITY (VA) SC 20/40, POST-OP VA SC 20/50. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 12316965 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 22, 2020Break; Break

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 1 MALFUNCTION EVENTS. THE EVENTS WERE RELATED TO LENS DAMAGE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT INJURIES REPORTED ASSOCIATED TO THE EVENTS

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10311658 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page