Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZCU225 (REF ZCU225U060)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS TORIC II 1-PC 06.0D CYL2.25 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474658691), received between Jun 30, 2023 and Aug 20, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S EYE. UPON INSERTION IT WAS OBSERVED THAT ONE OF THE HAPTICS WAS AMPUTATED. THE IOL WAS THEN REMOVED AND A BACKUP IOL OF THE SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS SUCH AS A CAPSULE TEAR, VITRECTOMY, INCISION ENLARGEMENT, OR SUTURES. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22854350 ↗
  • InjuryJun 30, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR SINISTER (LEFT EYE). PATIENT WAS HAVING DIFFICULTY WITH READING VISION. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THE SYMPTOMS SIGNIFICANTLY INTERFERE WITH NORMAL DAILY ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING NIGHT DRIVING. THE PRE-OPERATIVE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE WAS -0.25 AND THE FINAL REFRACTIVE VALUE POST-OPERATIVE WAS +-0.50. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING IOL EXPLANT IS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6)2023. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED CONFIRMING IOL EXPLANT WAS PERFORMED (B)(6)2023 AND THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION LENS. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY AND NO SUTURES. PATIENT'S OUTCOME POST-LENS EXCHANGE WAS REPORTED AS LENSES IN GOOD POSITION AND PATIENT IS WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 17243996 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page