Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZCU225 (REF ZCU225U170)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS TORIC II 1-PC 17.0D CYL2.25 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474658912), received between Feb 24, 2023 and Apr 24, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS FOUND TO HAVE ONE HAPTIC BROKEN OFF AFTER IT WAS PLACED IN THE EYE. THE IOL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. ACCOUNT INDICATED THAT THE HAPTIC WAS IN FRONT OF THE LENS ITSELF. THE IOL WAS REMOVED WITH A LENS CUTTER AND RETINAL FORCEPS, ALONG WITH THE HAPTIC. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING THE SAME MODEL LENS. THERE WAS NO INJURY REPORTED. NO SURGICAL AND MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS WERE REQUIRED. NO POST-OPERATIVE ISSUES WERE REPORTED. THE PRODUCT IS NOT RETURNING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19176099 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 24, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ZCU225 LENS USED AND REMOVED. THE LENS CONTACTED THE PATIENT EYE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16439243 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page