Skip to content

TECNIS IOL ZKU150 (REF ZKU150U190)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS TORIC LOW ADD 1-PC 19.0D CYL1.5 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474687004), received between Sep 4, 2024 and Mar 25, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Blurred Vision1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 25, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HAPTIC OF THE NON PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) BROKE OFF DURING INSERTION. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21691468 ↗
  • InjuryOct 14, 2024Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE DUE TO WRONG POWER IOL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY SUCH AS CAPSULE TEAR. NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, AND NO SUTURES PERFORMED. REPLACEMENT IOL WAS A NON-JOHNSON AND JOHNSON LENS. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20436725 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENSES(IOL) WERE IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED FROM THE LEFT EYE OF THE PATIENT. THE FIRST LENS (ZKU150U185, S/N (B)(6)) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT'S EYE AND EXPLANTED DUE TO BLURRY VISION AND REPLACED WITH SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER LENS (S/N:(B)(6)) IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF BLURRY VISION WITH THE REPLACED SECOND LENS TOO. THE REPLACED SECOND LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH LENS FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT ISSUES. PLATINUM CARTRIDGE WAS USED. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 20139211 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page