Skip to content

TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00 (REF DIB00U0075)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SIMPLICITY TECNIS EYHANCE U 07.5D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS SIMPLICITY (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474731509), received between Jan 30, 2025 and Mar 17, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Scratched Material

    A SCRATCH ON THE DIB00 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS NOTED AFTER ITS IMPLANTATION IN THE PATIENT'S OCULAR DEXTER (RIGHT EYE) THE IOL WAS REMOVED BY CUTTING IT INTO PIECES AND WAS REPLACED USING A BACK-UP DIB00 7.5 IOL DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO SERIOUS PATIENT INJURY, NO SUTURES, AND NO VITRECTOMY HOWEVER, PATIENT PROGNOSIS POST-PROCEDURE IS UNKNOWN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24624009 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S EYE. THE SURGEON NOTED A CRACK IN THE LENS OUTSIDE OF THE VISUAL AXIS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24000262 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DAMAGED AND THE HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. THE IOL CAME OUT OF THE INJECTOR THIS WAY AND NOT DUE TO INSERTION. THE LENS WAS CUT OFF AND REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE. ANOTHER LENS WAS INSERTED AS A REPLACEMENT. THROUGH FOLLOW UP, IT WAS LEARNED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION OUTSIDE THE STANDARD OF CARE WAS PERFORMED. THE LENS IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21280206 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page