Skip to content

TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00 (REF DIB00U0090)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SIMPLICITY TECNIS EYHANCE U 09.0D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS SIMPLICITY (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474731530), received between Oct 28, 2021 and Sep 25, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Jam” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Mechanical Jam2
  • Break1
  • Ejection Problem1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Inaccurate Delivery1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Eye Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 25, 2026Mechanical Jam

    It was reported that a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) would not fire/deploy from the chamber. The cartridge tip touched the patient's right eye. Unplanned sutures were required to protect the eye after attempting to insert the lens. An incision enlargement and unplanned vitrectomy were not required. Another Johnson & Johnson lens (same model and diopter) was implanted as a replacement. Patient status was reported as unknown. The product is not available to return. No other information is available.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50900947 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 2, 2026Break; Failure to Advance; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS REPORTED TO HAVE SUSTAINED DAMAGE DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE OPERATING ROOM NURSE, THE LENS BECAME STUCK DURING INSERTION, RESULTING IN A BENT HAPTIC. THE INCIDENT DID NOT INVOLVE A PATIENT AND NO ADVERSE EFFECTS OCCURRED. ANOTHER JOHNSON & JOHNSON LENS (SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER) WAS IMPLANTED AS A REPLACEMENT. THE CURRENT PATIENT OUTCOME WAS REPORTED AS UNKNOWN. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24477547 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2025Ejection Problem; Ejection Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS GOT STUCK. AT THE POINT OF INSERTION THERE WAS A MALFUNCTION WITH THE LOADING CARTRIDGE WHEN ENGAGING WITH THE PRELOADED IOL. THE DEVICE GOT STUCK. THE SURGEON HAD TO USE SUTURES BECAUSE IT CREATED A BIGGER INCISION WHEN THE CARTRIDGE WAS TAKEN OUT. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A CAPSULE TEAR OR OTHER COMPLICATIONS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 22856581 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2025Scratched Material; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Scratched Material; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS TORN OR SCRATCHED DURING IMPLANTATION. THE ISSUE WAS IDENTIFIED DURING IMPLANTATION/APPLICATION. THE LENS WAS IMPLANTED REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22180371 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2021Inaccurate Delivery; Inaccurate Delivery

    CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT MISFIRED. THRU FOLLOW-UP THEY EXPLAINED THAT THE PATIENT MOVED. THERE WAS NO DEFECT WITH THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) AND THIS WAS NOT A DOCTOR ERROR. THE PATIENT MOVED AND CAUSED THE LENS TO MISFIRE. SHE CONFIRMED THERE WAS NO CAPSULE TEAR, VITRECTOMY OR SUTURES. UNKNOWN IF THE IOL GOT DAMAGED BUT THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A BACKUP. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12712869 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page