Skip to content

TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00 (REF DIB00U0105)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SIMPLICITY TECNIS EYHANCE U 10.5D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS SIMPLICITY (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474731561), received between May 8, 2023 and Oct 10, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Scratched Material2
  • Break1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Swelling/ Edema1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 10, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MONOFOCAL LENS WAS DAMAGED DURING HANDLING. THERE WAS NO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20421319 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2023Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD TO EXPLANTED DUE TO AN IOL DEFECT. ANOTHER JOHNSON & JOHNSON EYHANCE LENS WAS IMPLANTED AS A REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING K EDEMA AND IS GOING TO HAVE IT FOR WEEKS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) /2023 REPORTING THIS WAS NOT A PLANNED EXPLANTATION. ON THE DAY OF THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A DEFECTIVE LENS WHICH THE SURGEON THEN HAD TO EXPLANT AND REPLACE WITH A NEW IOL. THE SERIAL NUMBER AND EVENT DATE WAS PROVIDED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE IOL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED A NON-CENTRAL CRACK WAS ON THE LENS. ALSO REPORTED AS SCRATCHED/DEFECTIVE LENS. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED THE LENS DEFECT IN THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE AND IT WAS PERIPHERAL. THE PATIENT WAS ASYMPTOMATIC. THEN ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED CRACK IN THE LENS. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND A NEW LENS WAS INSERTED ON THE SAME DAY. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 18196951 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 8, 2023Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Scratched Material; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Scratched Material

    DOCTOR REPORTED HE HAD PROBLEMS WITH TWO JOHNSON AND JOHNSON(JNJ) PRELOADED DEVICES THAT ARE 10.5 DIOPTER. ALL OTHER POWERS WERE FINE. THE FIRST INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD SOME RESISTANCE DURING INJECTION. THE IOL CAME OUT WITH A LARGE CENTRAL DIVOT IN THE OPTIC. IT HAD TO BE CUT OUT AND REMOVED. THE SECOND IOL ALSO HAD RESISTANCE AND WOULD NOT RELEASE FROM THE INJECTOR. THE TIP OF THE CARTRIDGE TOUCHED THE EYE. THE IOL WAS STUCK, DOCTOR PULLED OUT THE INJECTOR AND USED A THIRD LENS TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE THIRD IOL WAS FINE. DOCTOR STATED HE DOESN¿T REMEMBER EVER HAVING A PROBLEM LIKE THIS BUT SPOKE NOW TO OTHER DOCTORS WHO HAVE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16892682 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page