Skip to content

TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00 (REF DIB00U0115)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SIMPLICITY TECNIS EYHANCE U 11.5D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS SIMPLICITY (112)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474731585), received between Aug 11, 2021 and Nov 26, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LENS WAS RECEIVED DAMAGED. ATTEMPTS TO GET ADDITIONAL DETAILS WERE DONE HOWEVER, NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20789083 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS BENT/BROKEN HAPTIC DURING HANDLING PRIOR TO INSERTION. IT WAS STATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. NO OTHER ADVERSE EVENTS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING BACK-UP IOL OF THE SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER SIZE IOL. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16839715 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 11, 2021Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A DIB00 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAD A SCRATCH ON THE EDGE OF THE OPTIC . SURGEON LEFT THE LENS IN AS THE SCRATCH WAS NOT CENTRAL IN THE OPTIC ZONE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12310550 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page