TECNIS IOL DIU150 (REF DIU150U085)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC EYHANCE TOR II SMPLCTY 08.5D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474746312), received between Aug 12, 2021 and Aug 16, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Inaccurate Delivery1
- Mechanical Jam1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- Blurred Vision1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 16, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO BLURRINESS + VA OF 20/50. THE PATIENT DECIDED TO HAVE A LENS EXCHANGE. THERE WAS NO CAPSULE TEAR, NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY, NO SUTURES DONE. THE PATIENT WAS DOING WELL POST-OP. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision
MAUDE report 17561618 ↗MalfunctionAug 12, 2021Break; Mechanical Problem; Inaccurate Delivery; Mechanical Jam; Break; Mechanical Problem; Inaccurate Delivery; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE BEING INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE, A DIU150 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) MISFIRED, IT GOT STUCK IN CARTRIDGE, THEN THE PLUNGER BYPASSED THE IOL. IT WAS LEARNED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT WITH THIS DEVICE. THE DOCTOR FELT THAT THE DEPLOYMENT ISSUE COULD HAVE BEEN DUE TO THE THICKNESS OF THE 8.5 D LENS. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12316800 ↗
Other LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices
- TECNIS IOL ZCT150Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS1 recall7 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS43 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS36 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS32 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS30 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS29 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS21 reports
- TECNIS IOL DIU150Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS19 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page