Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DIU150 (REF DIU150U130)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC EYHANCE TOR II SMPLCTY 13.0D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474746404), received between Jun 17, 2022 and Apr 17, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Break1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Eye Injury1
  • Flashers1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 17, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WORSENING VISION IN BOTH EYES FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF PRELOADED MONOFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES (IOLS). THE PATIENT REPORTED SIGNIFICANT LIGHT SENSITIVITY, PARTICULARLY AT NIGHT WHILE DRIVING, WITH HEADLIGHTS CAUSING SEVERE IRRITATION, AS WELL AS PERSISTENT DOUBLE VISION AND POOR DISTANCE VISION IN THE RIGHT EYE. THE PATIENT STATED THAT THESE SYMPTOMS BEGAN IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ALTHOUGH THE EXACT SURGERY DATES WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED EXPERIENCING STARBURST EFFECTS PRIOR TO SURGERY; HOWEVER, FOLLOWING CATARACT SURGERY, THE STARBURSTS BECAME SIGNIFICANTLY BRIGHTER AND MORE PRONOUNCED, INCREASING SUBJECTIVELY FROM APPROXIMATELY FIVE TO FIFTY STARBURSTS, DESCRIBED AS CLEARER AND MORE VIBRANT. THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED EYE DROPS, INCLUDING PREDNISOLONE ACETATE, BEGINNING ON MARCH 18, 2026, WHICH REPORTEDLY IMPROVED PAIN AND LIGHT SENSITIVITY. DURING A FOLLOW UP VISION EVALUATION ON (B)(6), 2026, THE PATIENT CONTINUED TO REPORT POOR VISION AND DOUBLE VISION IN THE RIGHT EYE, WHILE THE LEFT EYE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE GOOD VISION. THE PHYSICIAN INITIALLY SUGGESTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IN THE RI

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Flashers; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 24918622 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 18, 2026Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), MODEL DIU150, WAS RECEIVED WITH A BLOODY FINGERPRINT ON THE BOX. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT OPENED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24384721 ↗
  • InjuryJun 2, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT'S LEFT EYE DUE TO OTHER DISORDERS OF THE EYE. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 22128569 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2025Break; Break

    FOLLOWING INSERTION THE DIU150 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS FOUND TO BE CRACKED WHILE UNFOLDING IN THE EYE. THE IOL WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A BACK-UP LENS WITH THE SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER SIZE THAT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR DEXTER (RIGHT EYE). THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY HOWEVER, IT IS UNKNOWN IF ANY MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE IOL WAS PREPPED FOR ABOUT FIVE (05) MINUTES PRIOR TO INSERTION AND IT IS UNSURE IF BALANCED SALT SOLUTION (BSS) OR OPHTHALMIC VISCOSURGICAL DEVICE - VISCOELASTIC (OVD) WAS USED. PATIENT PROGNOSIS POST-PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED AS SEEMED STABLE AND NORMAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22057609 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH THE SAME MODEL LENS WITH SAME DIOPTER IN THE SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THIS WAS DUE TO A FLIPPED CYLINDER AFTER SURGERY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE WERE NO DAILY ACTIVITIES AFFECTED. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21462987 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2022Unstable; Unstable

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED AN EXPLANT DUE TO THE INTRA-OCULAR LENS (IOL) IN THE RIGHT EYE ROTATING 40 DEGREES AND THE POWER BEING OFF. A REPLACEMENT LENS OF THE SAME MODE, BUT DIFFERENT DIOPTER (14.0) WAS USED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE PAIENT IS DOING GOOD POST-OP. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 14725814 ↗

Other LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices

All LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.