TECNIS IOL DIU150 (REF DIU150U180)Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474746503), received between Jul 21, 2022 and Dec 12, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryDec 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED AFTER THE IMPLANTATION OF A SINGLE PIECE PRELOADED MONOFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE, THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY SURGERY. THE REASON FOR THE EXPLANT IS UNKNOWN, HOWEVER, THE ISSUE WAS INITIALLY IDENTIFIED DURING A POST-OPERATIVE EXAMINATION. THE PATIENT'S PRE-OPERATIVE VISION WAS DOCUMENTED AS 20/50 AND POST-OPERATIVE VISION IS UNKNOWN. THERE WERE NO UNPLANNED SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS REQUIRED, SUCH AS VITRECTOMY OR SUTURES. ADDITIONAL MEDICAL ATTENTION WAS NOT REQUIRED, HOWEVER IT IS UNKNOWN IF ANY MEDICATION OUTSIDE THE STANDARD OF CARE WAS PRESCRIBED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE ISSUE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED THE PATIENT¿S DAILY ACTIVITIES. DIRECTIONS FOR USE WERE FOLLOWED. PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Eye Injury

  MAUDE report 23791064 ↗
• InjuryOct 11, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED/EXCHANGED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE DUE TO UNDERPOWERED TORIC CORRECTION. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CORRECT IOL WAS USED BASED ON VERACITY PRE-OP MULTI-VARIATE FORMULA ANALYSIS. THIS WAS REPLACED WITH A DIU300 MODEL IOL SAME DIOPTER POWER AS THE ORIGINAL IOL. THERE WAS NO VITRECTOMY AND NO DELAY IN PROCEDURE REPORTED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS INCISION ENLARGEMENT OR SUTURES REQUIRED. PATIENT OUTCOME UNKNOWN. EXPLANTED IOL DISCARDED. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Visual Impairment

  MAUDE report 17915621 ↗
• InjuryOct 4, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE NON-PRELOADED MONOFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT HAD RESIDUAL ASTIGMATISM AFTER SURGERY. REPLACED WITH THE DIU225 18.0 HIGHER DIOPTER. THE SUSPECT IOL IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Visual Impairment

  MAUDE report 17873870 ↗
• InjuryOct 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE DUE TO BLURRY DISTANCE VISION AS THEY¿RE UNABLE TO FOCUS. THE PRE-OPERATIVE VISUAL ACUITY IS WAS 20/60 -1. POST-OPERATIVE VISUAL ACUITY IS 20/40. THE IOL REMOVAL REQUIRED THE INCISION TO BE ENLARGED. THERE WAS NO VITRECTOMY AND NO SUTURES REQUIRED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Blurred Vision

  MAUDE report 15523763 ↗
• InjuryJul 21, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE DUE TO THE PATIENT BEING UNSATISFIED WITH NEAR VISION. ANOTHER JOHNSON & JOHNSON IOL (DIFFERENT MODEL, ZKB, DIFFERENT DIOPTER, 19.0). THE PATIENT IS FINE AND DOING WELL. THE LENS IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Discomfort

  MAUDE report 15080522 ↗