Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DIU225 (REF DIU225U140)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC EYHANCE TOR II SMPLCTY 14.0D CYL2.25 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474747012), received between Apr 4, 2022 and Mar 28, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Corneal Edema1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DOCTOR THAT A PRELOADED TORIC LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND A NEW LENS OF THE SAME MODEL WAS IMPLANTED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVEALED THAT THERE WAS A KINK AND THE LENS DID NOT CENTER PROPERLY. THEY DO NOT KNOW WHY THE LENS WOULD NOT CENTER PROPERLY. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND A NEW LENS WAS PLACE ON A DIFFERENT DAY THAN THE INITIAL DAY OF CATARACT REMOVAL AND LENS PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO ERROR LED TO THIS EVENT. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 21724659 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2022Break; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Break; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT IT WAS NOTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS TIGHT UPON TRYING TO INJECT IT FROM THE CARTRIDGE. ONCE IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE, A LARGE CENTRAL DEFECT WAS NOTED AND THE LENS HAD TO BE EXPLANTED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. ANOTHER LENS OF SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER WAS USED AS THE REPLACEMENT IOL. THERE WAS NO INJURY, BUT JUST REQUIRED LONGER RECOVERY DUE TO MORE CORNEAL EDEMA. THE PATIENT IS NOW FINE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Corneal Edema

    MAUDE report 14005451 ↗

Other LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices

All LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page