Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DIU375 (REF DIU375U050)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC EYHANCE TOR II SMPLCTY 05.0D CYL3.75 · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474748019), received between Jun 14, 2021 and Nov 4, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Scratched Material2
  • Ejection Problem1
  • Material Opacification1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2024Material Opacification; Material Opacification

    DURING PRODUCT HANDLING THE PRE-LOADED DIU375 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS REPORTED TO HAVE LOOKED HAZY AND IT HAD A SPOT ON IT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT WITH THE IOL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20595830 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2024Use of Device Problem; Scratched Material; Ejection Problem; Use of Device Problem; Scratched Material; Ejection Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE JOHNSON AND JOHNSON(JNJ) PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) DIDN¿T IMPLANT ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE INCISION. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE LENS FROM SUB-INCISIONAL AND THE TECHNICIAN RELOADED IT INTO A NEW CARTRIDGE AND INSERTER. CUSTOMER IS UNSURE IF THE SCRATCH WAS ON THE LENS PRIOR TO SURGERY OR IF IT HAPPENED WHEN MANIPULATING THE LENS OUT OF THE EYE AND INTO A NEW CARTRIDGE. CUSTOMER OPENED A NEW IOL JNJ MODEL DIU300 AND THE LENS WAS INSERTED AS PLANNED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19047873 ↗
  • InjuryJun 14, 2021Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS SCRATCHED. THE EVENT WAS OBSERVED UPON INSERTION INTO THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE AND THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS OF SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER. THERE WAS NO INJURY REPORTED, HOWEVER, SUTURE WAS PLACED. THE PATIENT WAS DOING GOOD. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11996758 ↗

Other LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices

All LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page