Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DFW150 (REF DFW150U245)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SYNERGY TORII SMPCY 24.5D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474751354), received between Oct 3, 2022 and May 6, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Halo1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TECNIS SYNERGY TORIC II SIMPLICITY INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE AND THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REPORTING DISTORTION IN VISION AND UNABLE TO SEE CLEARLY. THE DOCTOR HAD REFERRED PATIENT TO A RETINAL SPECIALIST IN (B)(6) 2023 AND WAS CLEARED. AFTER CONSULTING WITH PATIENT AND WITH NO IMPROVEMENT IN VISION, DOCTOR DECIDED TO EXPLANT THE SYNERGY LENS AND REPLACED THE IOL WITH AN OPTIBLUE DXW225 24.5 DIOPTER. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY AND NO SUTURES PERFORMED. THE PATIENT REPORTS FEELING "MUCH BETTER SINCE THE EXCHANGE". HER VISION IS "GREATLY IMPROVED" 4 DAYS POST OP. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 19256282 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE JOHNSON AND JOHNSON(JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) SHOWED CRACKED AFTER IT WAS INJECTED AND IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE. REPORTEDLY, IT WAS POSSIBLY DUE TO THE INJECTOR OR CARTRIDGE MISALIGNMENT. THE IOL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A LENS OF THE SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION SUCH AS PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION, YAG (YTTRIUM-ALUMINUM GARNET LASER TREATMENT), VITRECTOMY, CAPSULE TEAR, INCISION ENLARGEMENT OR SUTURES. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE DOING ¿OK¿. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17206303 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CUSTOMER REPORTED THEY EXPLANTED AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) FROM A PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE AS THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING HALOS, GLARE AND BLURRED VISION. THE ISSUE WAS FIRST NOTICED A FEW DAYS POST-OP. THE PATIENT WAS SEEN RECENTLY, AND THEY WERE STILL COMPLAINING OF HALOS AND GLARE. THE SYMPTOMS ARE NOT DEBILITATING AND THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS SUCH AS CAPSULE TEAR, VITRECTOMY, OR SUTURES. ANOTHER JOHNSON AND JOHNSON LENS, MODEL DIU150 OF 23.5 DIOPTER WAS USED AS A REPLACEMENT. THE CUSTOMER DECLINED TO RETURN THE EXPLANTED IOL SAYING IT IS A BIOHAZARD. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 15526812 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page