TECNIS IOL DXR00V (REF DXR00VU115)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SIMPLCTY TECNIS SYMF ERV OB 11.5D · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474761629), received between Nov 8, 2022 and Jan 27, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Crack1
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- Halo2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Unspecified Tissue Injury2
- Visual Disturbances2
- Visual Impairment2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 27, 2025Crack; Mechanical Jam; Crack; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CARTRIDGE OF THE PRELOADED JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) DID NOT WORK AS INTENDED CRACKED AT THE TIP. THERE WAS A LOT OF RESISTANCE, AND THE TIP CRACKED. THE IOL DID NOT CONTACT THE EYE ONLY THE CARTRIDGE TIP. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A BACKUP LENS OF THE SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21242444 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
A MALE PATIENT REPORTED OF INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) EXPLANTS ON BOTH EYES (OU) DUE TO EXPERIENCING HALOS, GLARE AND PHYSICAL DISCOMFORT. PRIOR TO SURGERY, THE PATIENT HAD CATARACTS AND -600 VISION IN BOTH EYES. AFTER SURGERY THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARES AND HALOS THAT IMPACTED HIS ABILITY TO DRIVE AND GO OUTSIDE. THE PATIENT STATED FOR NINE (9) MONTHS LIGHT MADE HIM CRY AND EVEN HAD TROUBLE WITH LIGHTS ON IN THE HOUSE. WHILE THE PATIENT HAD THE LENSES, HIS EYELIDS FELT LIKE MUSHY SPONGES AND WERE CONSTANTLY BLOODSHOT. THE PATIENT ATTRIBUTES THE ISSUE HE EXPERIENCED TO COATING AND THE DESIGN OF THE LENSES, COLLECTING TOO MUCH SUNLIGHT. THE PATIENT WAS TOLD HER WOULD SEE FROM "INFINITY TO 14 FEET" AND HE DID NOT WANT TO WEAR GLASSES ANYMORE AND TO BE ABLE TO READ THE PAPER. THE PATIENT SAW OTHER DOCTORS AND WAS ADVISED TO HAVE THEM REMOVED. THE LENSES WERE EXCHANGED, AND THE PATIENT HAS 20/20 VISION IN BOTH EYES WITH JOHNSON & JOHNSON MONOFOCAL REPLACEMENT LENSES. THE PATIENT STILL HAS TO WEAR GLASSES. A MONTH LATER 1.75 LEFT EYE, 2.0 RIGHT EYE. THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE WITH THE REPLACEMENT LENSES AND ONLY HAS SOME LEFTOVER CONDITIONS LIKE ITCHY EYES AND TEARS WHICH ARE DISSIPATING.
Patient problems: Halo; Unspecified Tissue Injury; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 18384340 ↗InjuryDec 12, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS REPORTED THE DXR00V MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR DEXTER (RIGHT EYE). IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO COMPLAINTS OF DYSPHOTOPSIA AND THE EXPLANTED IOL WAS REPLACED WITH A ZCB00 14.0 DIOPTER IOL FOR -1.75 TARGET. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. PATIENT OUTCOME POST-LENS EXCHANGE WAS REPORTED AS STABLE POST-OP WITH SYMPTOMS RESOLVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Halo; Unspecified Tissue Injury; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 18311941 ↗MalfunctionNov 8, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAS A DEFECTIVE LENS/SIMPLICITY LOADER. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15757215 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page