Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DXR00V (REF DXR00VU155)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SIMPLCTY TECNIS SYMF ERV OB 15.5D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474761704), received between Jan 26, 2023 and Jul 9, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), MODEL DXR00V, WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE AND EXCHANGED FOR A PURESEE LENS DURING A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE DUE TO THE PATIENT'S REPORTED QUALITY-OF-VISION CONCERNS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 25770207 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT'S LEFT EYE DUE TO MECHANICAL COMPLICATION, AND REPLACED WITH (B)(6) IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IT WAS LEARNT THAT THE PATIENT WAS UNHAPPY WITH VISION AT ALL RANGES. DURING POST-OP EXAMINATION IN FOLLOW UP WITH POST SURGICAL DOCTOR IT WAS STATED THAT IT THE IOL EXCHANGE HAD BEEN SCHEDULED. THERE WAS NO ISSUE WITH LENS, PLUNGER OR CARTRIDGE. THERE WAS NO USE ERROR. ONLY ALCON BSS 15ML WAS USED AS A CARTRIDGE LUBRICANT. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20052969 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THE SURGEON NOTICED A HOLE IN THE PRE-LOADED DXR00 INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) AND DID NOT USE IT. THE SAME PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING BACK-UP LENS WITH THE SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER SIZE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT, NO INJURY, NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO SUTURE(S), AND NO VITRECTOMY. PATIENT OUTCOME POST-PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED AS NO COMPLICATIONS. THE IOL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS IT WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16250972 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page