Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DXR00V (REF DXR00VU245)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS SIMPLCTY TECNIS SYMF ERV OB 24.5D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474761889), received between May 5, 2023 and Mar 26, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4

Patient problems

  • Visual Disturbances3
  • Blurred Vision2
  • Halo2
  • Flashers1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), MODEL DXR00V, WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE. POSTOPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT REPORTED DISSATISFACTION WITH VISUAL QUALITY, INCLUDING STARBURSTS WHEN DRIVING OR VIEWING LIGHTS, AS WELL AS HALOS, GLARE, AND OTHER VISUAL DISTURBANCES. AN IOL EXPLANT WAS INITIALLY SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2026 AND SUBSEQUENTLY RESCHEDULED TO (B)(6) 2026. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE EXPLANT PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, AND A PRELOADED MONOFOCAL IOL (MODEL DCB00, +24.5 DIOPTER) WAS IMPLANTED AS THE REPLACEMENT LENS. THE PRE-OPERATIVE REFRACTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED MULTIFOCAL IOL WAS +0.50 DIOPTERS, AND THE POST-OPERATIVE REFRACTION WAS ¿0.50 DIOPTERS, WITH AN INTENDED REFRACTIVE TARGET OF ¿0.30 DIOPTERS. NO YAG CAPSULOTOMY, UNPLANNED VITRECTOMY, INCISION ENLARGEMENT, OR SUTURES WERE REQUIRED DURING THE EXPLANT PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT¿S POST-EXPLANT CLINICAL OUTCOME IS UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME. A FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2026. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Flashers; Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 24706779 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED LENS WAS EXPLANTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT NEVER FELT THAT THEIR DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY WAS CLEAR AND SEEMED OUT OF FOCUS. THE PATIENT ALSO EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY DRIVING AT NIGHT DUE TO GLARE AND HALOS. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED DURING A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE WITH AN UNKNOWN LENS. THERE WERE NO INJURIES AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. THE BEST-CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (BCVA) IMPROVED FROM 20/30 PRE-OPERATIVELY TO 20/20 POST-OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT IS FULLY RECOVERED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 21541462 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THE DXR00V MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR SINISTER (LEFT EYE). DUE TO REPORTS OF IOL MECHANICAL COMPLICATIONS, THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH A NON-J&J LENS. IOL MECHANICAL COMPLICATION WAS CLARIFIED AS PATIENT REPORTING BLURRY VISION WHEN LOOKING FAR AWAY. PATIENT CONTINUED TO REPORT BLURRY VISION DURING (B)(6) 2024 FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO SURGICAL INTERVENTION DURING IOL EXCHANGE PROCEDURE. PATIENT OUTCOME POST-LENS EXCHANGE WAS REPORTED AS DOING WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 19076731 ↗
  • InjuryMay 5, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE AS THE PATIENT COULD NOT TOLERATE GLARE. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, NO VITRECTOMY AND NO SUTURES DONE. SUSPECT LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-JOHNSON AND JOHNSON IOL. NO PATIENT POST-OP INJURY REPORTED. PATIENT IS WELL. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16876984 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page