Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DXW150 (REF DXW150U180)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC SYMF TOR II OB SMPCY 18.0 CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474762930), received between Jan 6, 2023 and Sep 13, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision1
  • Halo1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 13, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT LEFT EYE IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT REPORTED OF DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY AND NEAR VISUAL ACUITY WAS VERY BLURRY. VISUAL ACUITY WAS UNBALANCED WITH VA OF 20/25 IN LEFT EYE. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A DIB00 LENS AND THE PATIENT FEELS GOOD WITH THE REPLACED LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND THERE WAS NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PATIENT HAD FULLY RECOVERED. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 20216550 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE DUE TO EXCESSIVE GLARE AND HALO, DYPHOTOPSIA AND AS THE PATIENT WAS NOT HAPPY WITH VISUAL OUTCOME. THE PATIENT'S DAILY ACTIVITIES WERE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED. REPLACEMENT IOL AND IS DIU150 17.5 DIOPTER. THERE WAS NO VITRECTOMY PERFORMED, NO SUTURES REQUIRED AND NO DELAY IN PROCEDURE REPORTED. THE PATIENT IS VERY HAPPY WITH HER VISION POST EXPLANT. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16118699 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page