Skip to content

TECNIS IOL DXW150 (REF DXW150U230)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC SYMF TOR II OB SMPCY 23.0 CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS IOL (1344)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474763036), received between Jul 24, 2023 and Jul 14, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3

Patient problems

  • Visual Impairment2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 14, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT WANTED MORE NEAR VISION. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH AN ODYSSEY MODEL DRT150 23.5 DIOPTER DURING A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THE DOCTOR STATED THAT THE CASE WENT WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 22501544 ↗
  • InjuryNov 17, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE DUE TO VISION DISSATISFACTORY FOR THE MONEY PAID. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DISTANCE VISION WAS ESPECIALLY TROUBLESOME. REPLACEMENT IOL THE SAME MODEL BUT LOWER DIOPTER POWER (22.5D). THE LENS WILL NOT BE RETURNED AS IT WAS DISCARDED AFTER EXPLANT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 18157520 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT IS REPORTED THAT INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE AS THE PATIENT WAS UNSATISFIED WITH NEAR VISION. UNPLANNED SUTURES WERE REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVEALED THAT INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER NON J&J MODEL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PRODUCT IS BEING RETURNED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 17386381 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page