Skip to content

TECNIS ODYSSEY IOL DRN00V (REF DRN00V0140)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TECNIS ODYSSEY SIMPLICITY 14.0D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS ODYSSEY IOL (49)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474810648), received between Dec 31, 2024 and Jul 21, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Scratched Material3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Discomfort1
  • Halo1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2026Scratched Material

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25893860 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 12, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED AN ISSUE WITH AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THAT BECAME TILTED IN THE PATIENT'S OPERATIVE EYE. THE DOCTOR ATTEMPTED TO REPOSITION THE LENS BUT INDICATED THAT REMOVAL MIGHT POTENTIALLY BE NECESSARY. THE DOCTOR ATTRIBUTED THE ISSUE TO THE SIZE OF THE PATIENT'S EYE, RATHER THAN ANY DEFECT IN THE ODYSSEY DEVICE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 22191453 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRELOADED LENS WAS INSERTED INTO THE EYE, AND THE SURGEON NOTICED A SCRATCH ON THE IOL AFTERWARD. THE LENS WAS CUT OUT, AND A NEW LENS WAS PLACED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVEALED THAT THE OPTIC WAS DAMAGED, AND THE BACKUP LENS WAS PLACED WITHOUT ISSUE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22146553 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 23, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    THE DOCTOR NOTICED INDENTATIONS ON THE OPTIC OF THE PRE-LOADED DRN00V MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. IT WAS STATED DAMAGED PRODUCT RECEIVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21442748 ↗
  • InjuryDec 31, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE AS THE PATIENT WAS NOT HAPPY WITH VISION EXPERIENCING VISUAL ISSUES, INCLUDING HALOS AND BLURRINESS. THE ISSUE WAS IDENTIFIED DURING POST-OP EXAM AND THE PATIENT SOUGHT MEDICAL ATTENTION DUE TO THE COMPLICATIONS. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN THE SECONDARY PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH ZCB00 WITH 15.0 DIOPTER. THE BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY BSCVA) PRE-OPERATIVE WAS 20/60. THE PATIENT HAD FULLY RECOVERED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IT WAS LEARNT THAT THERE WAS NO PRODUCT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO CALCULATION ISSUE. THERE WAS NO USE ERROR. THE PATIENT FEEL BETTER WITH REPLACED LENS. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Discomfort; Halo

    MAUDE report 21048614 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page