TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL DRT150 (REF DRT1500120)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC ODYSSEY TOR II SMPCY 12.0D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL (106)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474811195), received between Dec 26, 2024 and Nov 17, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
Patient problems
- Visual Disturbances3
- Blurred Vision1
- Distress1
- Halo1
- Visual Impairment1
- Vitreous Detachment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 17, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DRT150 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR SINISTER (LEFT EYE). POST-OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT REPORTED ALL LETTERS/WORDS HAVE A SHADOW AURA AROUND THEM, DISTANCE AND NEAR VISION ARE NOT CLEAR, DIFFICULTY READING, HALOS AROUND LIGHTS, AND DIFFICULTY WITH GLARE. VISION PRE-OPERATIVE WAS 20/50 AND POST-OPERATIVELY WAS 20/60-2. THUS, THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH A DIB00 12.0 DIOPTER IOL. THERE WAS NO VITRECTOMY DURING THE LENS EXCHANGE PROCEDURE HOWEVER IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE INCISION WAS ENLARGED OR IF SUTURES WERE REQUIRED. MEDICAL ATTENTION WAS REQUIRED AND PREDNISOLONE ACETATE MEDICATION WAS PRESCRIBED. PATIENT PROGNOSIS POST LENS EXCHANGE WAS REPORTED AS UNKNOWN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Halo; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 23576343 ↗InjuryFeb 10, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE DUE TO EXCESSIVE GLARE. THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-JOHNSON AND JOHNSON LENS MODEL INVISTA INSPIRE 14.0 DIOPTER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT INJURIES SUCH AS CAPSULE TEAR, VITRECTOMY, INCISION ENLARGEMENT OR SUTURES. THERE WERE NO PRESCRIBED MEDICATIONS REQUIRED TO PREVENT PERMANENT INJURY. THE PATIENT¿S OUTCOME WAS REPORTED AS DOING WELL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 21349601 ↗InjuryDec 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT AND LEFT EYE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SEVERAL POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS. FOLLOWING THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED NEW SYMPTOMS IN BOTH EYES, INCLUDING VISUAL HALLUCINATIONS SUCH AS SEEING GEOMETRIC SHAPES, TREES, HILLS, FACES, AND RED WRITING ON WALLS, WHICH THE SURGEON NOTED SOUNDS LIKE CHARLES BONNET SYNDROME. TO ALLEVIATE DISCOMFORT, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN WEARING SUNGLASSES FULL-TIME SINCE SURGERY. THE PATIENT SPEND SIX DAYS AT THE EMERGENCY ROOM (ER) DUE TO EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND VISUAL DISTURBANCES (SELF-CHECKED IN). A MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) WAS CONDUCTED AND SHOWED NO ABNORMALITIES (WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS). PSYCHIATRIC CONDITIONS, HALLUCINATIONS, AND MENTAL ILLNESS WERE ALL RULED OUT. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN ADVISED TO FOLLOW UP WITH NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERE IS A PLAN FOR AN INTRAOCULAR LENS EXCHANGE FROM A MULTIFOCAL TO STANDARD LENS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PATIENT HAS DEVELOPED POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT IN BOTH EYES, A NEW CONDITION SINCE THE SURGERY, AND EXPERIENCES MONOCULAR DIPLOPIA IN BOTH EYES, WHICH WAS CONFIRMED ON (B)(6) 2024. CURRENTLY, TH
Patient problems: Distress; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment; Vitreous Detachment
MAUDE report 21021311 ↗
Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular144 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular1 recall66 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular113 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular112 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular110 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular107 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular104 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular93 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page