TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL DRT150 (REF DRT1500135)Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474811225), received between Sep 6, 2024 and Nov 26, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionNov 26, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT VISIBLE MARKS OR SCRATCHES WERE FOUND ON THE PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) AFTER THE LENS WAS FULLY INSERTED IN THE OPERATIVE EYE. NO UNPLANNED INCISION ENLARGEMENT, VITRECTOMY, OR SUTURES WERE REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL ATTENTION OR MEDICATION PRESCRIBED OUTSIDE THE STANDARD OF CARE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT IS FULLY RECOVERED. DIRECTIONS FOR USE WERE FOLLOWED. THE LENS REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23657776 ↗
• InjuryNov 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE DRT150 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S OCULAR DEXTER (RIGHT EYE). DUE TO COMPLAINTS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH NEAR VISION, THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH A ZCU150 17.0 IOL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO SURGICAL INTERVENTION DURING THE EXPLANT PROCEDURE. PATIENT'S PROGNOSIS POST LENS EXCHANGE WAS REPORTED AS GOOD. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Blurred Vision

  MAUDE report 23641032 ↗
• InjuryMay 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING MYOPIA SURPRISE, NIGHT TIME DISTURBANCES WERE MORE THAN EXPECTED. THE ISSUE WAS NOTICED DURING A POST-OPERATIVE EXAMINATION. THE PATIENT¿S PRE-OPERATIVE VISUAL ACUITY WAS REPORTED AS PRE-OPERATIVE BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (BSCVA) 20/25. THEIR POST-OPERATIVE BSCVA WAS NOT REPORTED. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH THE SAME MODEL. THERE WAS NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT, VITRECTOMY, SUTURES OR DELAY IN PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION OR REQUIRE MEDICATION OUTSIDE THE STANDARD OF CARE. THE PATIENT IS HEALTHY AND BOTH THE SURGEON AND PATIENT ARE HAPPY WITH THE REPLACEMENT LENS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Visual Impairment

  MAUDE report 21989268 ↗
• InjurySep 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE. THE REASON FOR THE EXPLANT IS THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF VISUAL DISCOMFORT, GLARE, AND HALOS. THE REPLACEMENT IOL IS A BAUSCH & LOMB SOFPORT - ADVANCED OPTICS ASPHERIC LENS, POWER 16.5 AND MODEL PC: LI61AO. THERE WAS NO INJURY SUCH AS A CAPSULE TEAR. REPORTEDLY, INTERVENTIONS SUCH AS INCISION ENLARGEMENT, VITRECTOMY, SUTURES, OR MEDICAL WERE NOT APPLICABLE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

  MAUDE report 20164615 ↗