Skip to content

TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL DRT150 (REF DRT1500150)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC ODYSSEY TOR II SMPCY 15.0D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL (106)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474811256), received between Apr 30, 2025 and Feb 13, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Application Program Problem: Dose Calculation Error” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Application Program Problem: Dose Calculation Error2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1

Patient problems

  • Capsular Bag Tear1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 13, 2026Application Program Problem: Dose Calculation Error

    THE DRT150 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S EYE. POST-OPERATIVELY, THE SURGEON SELECTED THE WRONG IOL, THUS THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH A DRN00V 16.0 IOL. PATIENT IS HEALTHY AND WELL, THERE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE IOL, AND SURGEON IS PLEASED WITH OUTCOME. PATIENT IS SEEING WELL WITH THE NEW, BETTER IOL SELECTION. THE SUSPECT IOL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR INVESTIGATION AS IT WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24340061 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (JNJ) INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT¿S EYE AND THEN REMOVED BECAUSE THE CAPSULAR BAG BROKE. THE SURGEON HAD TO CUT THE IOL OUT OF THE EYE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear

    MAUDE report 22092929 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2025Application Program Problem: Dose Calculation Error; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Application Program Problem: Dose Calculation Error; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT'S EYE DUE TO HYPEROPIC SURPRISE-POWER MISS. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THERE WAS PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE. FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IT WAS LEARNT THAT LENS REPLACED DUE TO CALCULATION ISSUE RESULTING IN A HYPEROPIC OUTCOME. THE DAILY ACTIVITIES WERE NOT AFFECTED. THE PATIENT WAS SATISFIED WITH THE REPLACED LENS. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 21939660 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page