TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL DRT150 (REF DRT1500155)Recalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC ODYSSEY TOR II SMPCY 15.5D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant
All models of TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL (106)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474811263), received between Feb 13, 2025 and Sep 25, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Scratched Material2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Blurred Vision1
- Eye Injury1
- Halo1
- Visual Disturbances1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 25, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 50903343 ↗InjuryApr 6, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE RIGHT EYE DUE TO AN UNKNOWN REASON. THE REPLACEMENT LENS WAS ANOTHER JOHNSON AND JOHNSON (DRT150 14.0). THE DOUVISC WAS USED AS VISCOELASTIC. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Eye Injury
MAUDE report 24793461 ↗InjuryApr 2, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT THE FIRST EYE SURGERY WITH A TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC SIMPLICITY INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IS NOT RECEIVING THE EXPECTED NEAR VISION POST-OPERATION. THE PATIENT'S VISUAL ACUITY MEASUREMENTS WERE PROVIDED AS DISTANCE VISION (DV): 20/20, PINHOLE (PH): 20/25 -2, NEAR VISION (NV): J8, MANIFEST REFRACTION (MR) +0.25 +0.50 X021 20/25 -1, AND ADD +2.00 J1+. PATIENT STATED HIS DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY SEEMS PRETTY GOOD BUT EXPERIENCED INTERMITTENT HAZY VISION IN THE OPERATED EYE (OS) AND STRUGGLES WITH NEAR VISION TASKS, HE CANNOT SEE HIS COMPUTER WITH HIS LEFT EYE. NO PAIN OR DISCOMFORT HAS BEEN REPORTED, AND THE PATIENT HAS NOT BEEN USING TEAR DROPS. NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAID) AND STEROID DROPS ARE SCHEDULED AS PART OF THE MEDICAL INTERVENTION. THE SECOND EYE SURGERY FOR RIGHT IS PLANNED FOR ON (B)(6) 2025. THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPLANTING THE LEFT LENS IS BEING CONSIDERED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision
MAUDE report 21756279 ↗MalfunctionFeb 13, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Scratched Material; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Scratched Material
THE PRE-LOADED DRT150 MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS INJECTED INTO THE PATIENT'S OCULAR SINISTER (LEFT EYE) AND THE LENS WAS GORGED ON THE OUTER SIDE OF THE LENS. THE DAMAGE WAS CLARIFIED AS A DEEP SCRATCH ON THE PERIPHERAL EDGE. DUE TO THE PERIPHERAL LOCATION OF THE SCRATCH, THE SURGEON DECIDED TO LEAVE THE IOL IMPLANTED. THE DOCTOR STATED IT WAS A LITTLE TIGHT WHEN HE PUSHED THE LENS IN. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE INCISION WAS ENLARGED HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO MEDICAL ATTENTION, NO MEDICATION WAS PRESCRIBED, NO PROCEDURAL DELAYS, NO SUTURES, AND NO VITRECTOMY DURING THE PROCEDURE. VISCOELASTIC WAS USED AND THE SURGICAL TECHNICIAN IS EXPERIENCED WITH PRE-LOADED LENSES. THE LENS ARE KEPT IN A SEPARATE ROOM WITHIN TEMPERATURE OUTSIDE THE OPERATING ROOM (OR). PATIENT'S DAILY ACTIVITIES SIGNIFICANTLY WERE NOT AFFECTED. PATIENT PROGNOSIS POST-PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED AS FULLY RECOVERED. THE SUSPECT IOL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS IT REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21381932 ↗MalfunctionFeb 13, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON NOTICED THE LENS WAS SCRATCHED AND UPON EXAMINATION UNDER THE MICROSCOPE, IT WAS CONFIRMED. THIS LENS DID NOT COME INTO CONTACT WITH A PATIENT AND NO PATIENT WAS PRESENT IN THE ROOM AT THE TIME OF OPENING OR TESTING THE LENS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21381560 ↗
Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular144 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular1 recall66 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular113 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular112 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular110 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular107 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular104 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular93 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page