Skip to content

TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL DRT150 (REF DRT1500235)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC ODYSSEY TOR II SMPCY 23.5D CYL1.50 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL (106)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474811423), received between Jan 9, 2025 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 2 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5

Patient problems

  • Visual Disturbances4
  • Halo2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Eye Irritation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 50952802 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LENS EXCHANGE PROCEDURE DUE TO HALO AND GLARE ISSUES WITH A PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), MODEL DRT150. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A MONOFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS, MODEL DIU150 OF 23.5 DIOPTER. THIS SECONDARY SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS CLASSIFIED AS A PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT RELATED TO THE DEVICE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 23660337 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS REMOVED FROM THE LEFT EYE OF A PATIENT DUE TO DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE PATIENT HAD VISUAL ACUITY (VA) 20/25 AND J1. THE EXPLANTED LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A ZCU MODEL TORIC LENS OF THE SAME POWER. THE PATIENT IS DOING OKAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. THIS EMDR REPORT PERTAINS TO PATIENT'S LEFT EYE. A SEPARATE REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 23089481 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM THE RIGHT EYE OF A PATIENT DUE TO DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE PATIENT HAD VISUAL ACUITY (VA) 20/25 AND J1. THE EXPLANTED LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A ZCU150 TORIC LENS OF THE SAME POWER AS THE ORIGINAL LENS. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS REPORTED. THE PATIENT IS DOING OKAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. THIS EMDR REPORT PERTAINS TO PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE. A SEPARATE REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 23089476 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO BLURRY VISION AND IRRITATION. IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER JOHNSON & JOHNSON LENS DURING A SECONDARY SURGICAL PROCEDURE. INCISION ENLARGEMENT WAS REQUIRED. NO INJURY OR ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS NECESSARY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Eye Irritation

    MAUDE report 21120610 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page